There is no basis for your claim science is not a source of proof to me.
This brings us to the question which the Pilate story has made famous ─ what is truth?
I use the "correspondence" definition ─ that truth is a quality of statements, and a statement is true to the extent that it corresponds with / accurately reflects objective reality. Thus truth answers to a test as objective as we can make it.
What definition of truth do you use? What objective test for truth does it provide?
Or does it leave you free to make up whatever you like?
I know from first hand experience that consciousness is separate from the brain.
Or, you have the knack of inducing dissociative experiences ─ "out-of-body experiences" ─ pretty much when you want.
But you know they're not real, because you never return from them with new remote knowledge of reality. So you make the untenable claim that there's no such thing as objective reality ─ all the time fatally contradicting yourself by conducting this thread in conversation with all these real people including me.
If you're right and there's no such thing as the world external to the self (objective reality / nature / the realm of the physical sciences &c) then you're just talking to yourself, inventing us and our answers, pure solipsism.
Or else ─ as your conduct necessarily implies ─ we do exist outside of your imagination, there really is a world external to the self ─ objective reality ─ and you're simply but fundamentally mistaken.
Or else ─ if you're joking ─ you're not nearly funny enough.
If you would like to have the same experiences as me you can do so
But that's just dreaming. We real people tend to put a real value on reality. And I prefer to alter my mood with a fine scotch or bourbon or (my first love) rum ─ none of which I have to make up, because they're real.
Memory is not stored in the brain, the brain
Where is your memory stored, and how can I access it?
That's your problem, you think there should be a test for everything and if you can't test something you just deny it.
That's certainly applicable in this case ─ the correctness of extraordinary claims must be demonstrated to an extraordinary degree, but you have only words and dreams; you fail all tests.
Which brings us back to the test you use for truth.