Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Almost.Gee, it's almost like there exists a bad role model fueling all this rage.
So police go to serve a warrant, a firefight erupts and this is a mass shooting?
Seriously? There's a massive shoot out, at least 6 officers injured, and you don't see a problem?So police go to serve a warrant, a firefight erupts and this is a mass shooting?
I am just trying to understand what your complaint is here?
Anybody who wants to take my gun away from me is going to have to do this over my dead body.
That's very close to a generic threat to attack cops with deadly force if they legally have legal justification for removing your guns. If I were in law enforcement, I'd want to know if that was sufficient justification for a warrant.
And that attitude is exactly why I'm 100% in favor of gun control - to make sure people with your attitude don't have guns.
You left out the part about how nobody's gun shot wounds were life threatening.
Anybody who wants to take my gun away from me is going to have to do this over my dead body.
6 people have been shot. I'd say that qualifiesEverytime a gun is fired does not equate to a mass shooting.
...which makes it OK?They were called there because of narcotics activity.
?? How do you equate that with what I said, the police responded to narcotics activity and were shot....which makes it OK?
6 people have been shot. I'd say that qualifies
And so are you arguing that as long as the wounds caused aren't "life threatening," it should be okay for anybody to go around shooting anybody else?You left out the part about how nobody's gun shot wounds were life threatening.
Anybody who wants to take my gun away from me is going to have to do this over my dead body.
So you are advising police not to respond to narcotics activity, so as not to get shot??? How do you equate that with what I said, the police responded to narcotics activity and were shot.
Anything to avoid acknowledging the glaring obvious problem, I guess.And so are you arguing that as long as the wounds caused aren't "life threatening," it should be okay for anybody to go around shooting anybody else?
6 cops who were raiding a drug dealers house doesn't fall into the realm of a crazed mass shooter with an agenda.