Wow. Have you jumped before?
Nope. First time. My daughter and I are going together.
Something to scratch off my bucket list.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wow. Have you jumped before?
Global Warming also known as human caused global warming, is the rising average temperature of earth atmosphere and oceans and its related effects, sometimes popularly summarized as climate change. But there’s another group out there popularly knowns as global warming deniers who say,
Which makes more sense?
- A is not happening
- B) is not caused by humans
- C) is not significant enough to be a threat
What video are you talking about - one from the scientists for the oil companies?
I am (C).
Consensus isnt proof and thus dont matter.
Plus, i seen a video of a research group who if i remember correctly, got 40 or 400 thousand signatures from scientists who agree its not a threat.
I am (C).
Consensus isnt proof and thus dont matter.
Plus, i seen a video of a research group who if i remember correctly, got 40 or 400 thousand signatures from scientists who agree its not a threat.
I am (C).
Consensus isnt proof and thus dont matter.
Plus, i seen a video of a research group who if i remember correctly, got 40 or 400 thousand signatures from scientists who agree its not a threat.
The Finnish and Japanese study they quote does not argue against co2 and methane as causes of global warming only that galactic rays may also influence it. Misquoting is deception so read the source before using propaganda.
I dont remember. But, i can look for the vid and give it to u if you want me too?
Setting up for a semantic "well 99% certainty isn't irrefutable", "science doesn't ever irrefutably prove anything" argument, I see. Lame.Name one scientist that has gone public with irrefutable proof.
Because u Consensus isn’t proof and thus doesn’t matter. Makes believe
1. You don’t know what your talking about in regards to climate change
2.You badly underestimate the expert consensus, which is above 90%
But go ahead a continue to watch your YouTube videos were you remember seeing 40/400k signatures from scientists saying climate change is not a threat.
Global Warming also known as human caused global warming, is the rising average temperature of earth atmosphere and oceans and its related effects, sometimes popularly summarized as climate change. But there’s another group out there popularly knowns as global warming deniers who say,
Which makes more sense?
- A is not happening
- B) is not caused by humans
- C) is not significant enough to be a threat
There is no video and there were no 40/400k signatures. It’s was nothing but propaganda form article on an unreliable website.
No, 30,000 scientists have not said climate change is a hoax
Rather a minor nitpick. Do you think it invalidates the greater point?
Hard to figure out who lie...The Finnish and Japanese study they quote does not argue against co2 and methane as causes of global warming only that galactic rays may also influence it. Misquoting is deception so read the source before using propaganda.
Why bother looking for a youtube clip? There's a link to the alleged petition in @Prometheus85 excelent link:That joged my memory, yea, it was 30 thousand from a vid i seen. Cant find the vid though. Its somewhere. Ill still look.
Rather a minor nitpick. Do you think it invalidates the greater point?
Climate has always changed. Never so fast before, though. You know when the 10 hottest years on record were?Hard to figure out who lie...
My understanding : it is non issue, pure political. Climate always changed . As always knowing 5% of 5%...
I will be happy to see it.I dont remember. But, i can look for the vid and give it to u if you want me too?