Your "interest" includes sending me hundreds, even thousands of words, to tell me why I can't call the third gospel "Luke" like everyone else does on the planet. That's being a Pharisee at best and a pain in the behind at worst. You really have an axe to grind against the Bible, not a mere "interest" IMHO.
IMHO, don't pick fights with God!
I am not picking a fight with God, because God didn’t write the Bible.
All you are doing, is associating man-made written texts, to God being the author.
And you are foolishly attempting to make trying to turn the man-written Bible into inerrant and infallible like God. Is that essentially idol worshipping?
And you are wrong, I have no axe to grind with Bible.
When I was younger, I actually accept the Bible as it is, because I didn’t have the maturity, nor the experience, to recognise that some parts of the Bible have errors and contradictions, so I had taken everything written at its face value, without investigating what I read.
As a teenager, no one can blame me, for being too inexperienced to check and double check what I read. Then for 14 years, I didn’t touch the Bible, because my studies and jobs took higher priority than religion. But despite 14 years hiatus from the Bible, I was still a believer in the Bible.
It wasn’t until a year (2000) after creating my Timeless Myths (1999) that I touched the Bible again, that I began to look at the Bible with fresh eyes.
My priors works as civil engineer, help me to see value of checking and double checking my calculation of design that structure of any building use the most effective measurement that support both design and safety requirements. And when I decided to change my career to computer science, from 1995-1999, and went back to university, I created Timeless Myths (1999) as personal website, like a hobby. But it was hobby that required a lot of effort, to read and to research, and to check and double check my sources.
These experiences of checking and double checking, I applied to when I started reading the Bible again, in 2000, the skill that I didn’t have when I was a teenager.
Do you what the first error I saw?
It wasn’t creation vs evolution, and it was the Bible vs history. No my first doubt to bible’s inerrancy come from the author’s Matthew 1:22-23 interpretation of Isaiah’s sign (Isaiah 7:14).
You see, when I was younger I read both Matthew and Isaiah, and didn’t bother to compare the two together, hence no double checking. I took what I read from Matthew 1:22-23 at face value, and didn’t see that Isaiah’s sign was much larger than gospel’s cherrypicking passage.
When I re-read Isaiah 7, the complete chapter, I recognized that the sign had nothing to do with Mary’s pregnancy and Jesus’ birth. The sign had to do with Ahaz’s war against Pekah and Rezin.
Seeing this bogus claim, I began re-reading other verses of signs or prophecies in Matthew 2, and saw more errors and cherrypicking from the gospel author, because I began to double check the gospels’ claims against the other sources from the Old Testament passages.
That what have started my first doubts about the Bible. It wasn’t science or history that made me questioning the Bible’s truthfulness and accuracies, and my first step towards agnosticism.