Nonsense. You wrote: "Not at all, to refute this it costs no time at all. When men marry men, mankind extincts within 100 years roughly. this tells you it is against nature."
That implies two things very directly:
- that "all" men marry men, because if that were not the case, then children are still being produced.
- that it is marriage that causes children, not heterosexual sex, so it is necessary that all men also stop having heterosexual sex, even if they are not marrying other men.
Apparently, you are unaware that it is actually only a very, very few men who wish to marry other men, and only a very, very few women who wish to marry other women. And you also seem to be unaware that, if they are not allowed to do that, they are not going to automatically revert to heterosexual and go produce babies.
You also seem to be entirely unaware that many, many species of other animals than humans also engage in homosexual behaviour, and some of them do so exclusively...yet, their species seem to continue just fine (until we humans get to them of course, and contribute to their extinction … which IS unnatural!)
When I used the term "ignorance," I meant it in the strictly dictionary way: not knowledgeable about a subject. And on this topic, you have demonstrated that you do not possess anything like enough knowledge to be able to say anything remotely worthwhile about it. That, of course, never stops people. It is usually those who know least about a bunch of topics who have the most to say about them, and with the most conviction.
You know what IS unnatural? Plastic...it exists nowhere in nature, yet we humans are making enough of it that we're on the verge of choking our entire planet on it. And I'm willing to be you use a lot of plastic.