A good friend of mine has been a Baptist (SBC) deacon for over 40 years, and he and I used to talk a lot about religious matters. He used to teach science at the high school level, including biology, and he fully accepted the basic ToE but also believed that God was behind it all. Trouble was and is that the SBC does not accept the ToE and has had purges to eliminate those pastors and deacons that may teach that as being real. Even though my friend wanted to leave his church and go to another Baptist church that was less restrictive along those lines, his wife was adamant that they should stay where they were-- much to his chagrin. So, he couldn't talk about evolution at all in front of the congregation or even behind closed doors with anyone in the church. so he vented with me on this and some other matters that were bothering him along that line.
During one of our conversations, probably sometime in the early 1980's, we were talking about the ToE, and he reached in his drawer at his desk and pulled out a book that was entitled something like "Revolt of the Faithful". It was authored by a former Baptist minister who also had a t.v. ministry in one of the Southern states, and what upset the pastor enough to leave both was the results of a confidential survey that was taken amongst Baptist several years before.
What the confidential survey showed was that amongst Baptist pastors, roughly 70% actually accepted the basic ToE as likely being accurate, but the vast majority of them (I don't recall that stat) could not openly talk about it in front of their congregation because of fear of being removed either by the heads of the conference/convention or by the congregation itself, much the same position my deacon friend was in. However, in this case, the pastor simply could not any longer be willing to avoid the subject or lie about it, so he left the Baptist church altogether.
He goes on to say in the book that most of the pastors he knows personally just avoid talking about evolution and dread the thought of anyone in the congregation asking them a question about it. If asked, what do you do? lie? what?
What I can't remember is where he said he went afterward, but I think it was with a more reason-oriented Christian denomination that's not anti-science. His disgust was certainly not with God nor Jesus but with the utter hypocrisy found within his own denomination.