RabbiO
הרב יונה בן זכריה
This only proves that Jews have corrupted the teachings of Moses and the Christians have corrupted the teachings of Jesus. Please
Regards
Have you given any thought to psychotropic medication?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This only proves that Jews have corrupted the teachings of Moses and the Christians have corrupted the teachings of Jesus. Please
Regards
Let's say that that is exactly what it means. Why would that be a problem - that a law warns against behavior so people abide by the law? Until you can show that it DID happen, why assume so? Does the text give any examples of a rebellious child (Deut 21:18)?
No, he wasn't. Why would you assume he was?paarsurrey said: ↑
Does one mean that Judaism people never acted on this commandment from Moses mentioned in the Torah*? Please
*Deuteronomy Chapter 13:1-11
Balaam was a false prophet mentioned in Torah Num. xxii*.-xxiv.
What did the Jews do to him? Please
Regards
*Numbers Chapter 22
Does one mean that Balaam was a truthful prophet? PleaseNo, he wasn't. Why would you assume he was?
He was a prophet. Just not to the Jews.paarsurrey said: ↑
paarsurrey said: ↑
Does one mean that Judaism people never acted on this commandment from Moses mentioned in the Torah*? Please
*Deuteronomy Chapter 13:1-11
Balaam was a false prophet mentioned in Torah Num. xxii*.-xxiv.
What did the Jews do to him? Please
Regards
*Numbers Chapter 22
Does one mean that Balaam was a truthful prophet? Please
Regards
Then why did Jews killed Balaam*? PleaseHe was a prophet. Just not to the Jews.
Judaism 101: Prophets and Prophecy
I guess that depends on what you are looking for in terms of "truthful." According to Judaism, he received a message from God and it was his role to spread that message, which he did. I'm not sure what else you are getting at.Does one mean that Balaam was a truthful prophet? Please
Regards
Then why did Jews killed Balaam*? Please
Regards
_______________
*Balaam
"He was killed along with the Midianites by the Israelites" (Num** 31:8)
Was Balaam a true follower of Yahweh?
**8 And they slew the kings of Midian with the rest of their slain: Evi, and Rekem, and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, the five kings of Midian; Balaam also the son of Beor they slew with the sword.
"why did Jews kill Balaam?"I guess that depends on what you are looking for in terms of "truthful." According to Judaism, he received a message from God and it was his role to spread that message, which he did. I'm not sure what else you are getting at.
He died in battle. Are you asking "why was there a war"? He was not put to death or executed under any particular law about being a prophet.paarsurrey said: ↑
Does one mean that Balaam was a truthful prophet? Please
Regards
Then why did Jews kill Balaam*? Please
Regards
"why did Jews kill Balaam?"
The question, please
Regards
Ayahuasca will wake them up....or the Holy Anointing oil made properly.Have you given any thought to psychotropic medication?
Are you that somebody?Can't such persons be left alone if they have not harmed somebody physically. Please
Regards
No.Are you that somebody?
Are you basing your post on these Qur'anic verses, by any chance (highlighting mine)?
If so, then I suggest not making assumptions about people of other beliefs based on your own scriptures just because your scriptures say they did this or that, unless you can show historical evidence that your scriptures are 100% accurate. Otherwise posts like yours amount to libeling a large group of people based on nothing more than subjective beliefs.
"He not only believed that Jesus avoid death, but based on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Jesus migrated to India, after the crucifixion.Actually is even more than that.
Paarsurrey is an Ahmadi.
He not only believed that Jesus avoid death, but based on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Jesus migrated to India, after the crucifixion.
This is pure fabrication, with no historical basis and evidences that Jesus ever set foot in India.
The whole Jesus in India, is purely to elevate Ahmad's own position as the new and "messiah".
I personally think it is purely propaganda to promote his new religion.
Actually, this is copying Muhammad's own propaganda, that Abraham came to what would be later be Mecca, with his son Ishmael, to help with building his house - the Kaaba, before going back to his home in Canaan.
There are no historical evidences for Abraham travelling over 1200 km to Mecca, just so find a new home. All we have Muhammad's hearsay.
Muhammad clearly wanted a way to increase his own status by claiming a descendant of Abraham, via Ishmael...of which neither are historical figures.
That would require some professional doctor's and a clinic, I should know since I was that person once.No.
It is a principled stance. It could be anybody. Such a person must not be harmed physically or his property. One has a right just to give reasons and arguments to such a person that his stance is incorrect. Nothing more.
Regards
No, paarsurrey.And one means that history is only that what has been written in the West?