Reaching the most logical conclusion is rational.
Kilgore, I should have said that atman is what one is -- by definition. I wish to know why you equate having 'truth as the desire and resolve' to death?
...
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Reaching the most logical conclusion is rational.
Waveform, and we are particulate; but what we can do is align and resonate... just as the tao upon which we trod is not the eternal tao, our resonations can progressively approach but not achieve waveform. Truth, it seems, brings a lessening of differentiation; but to become true is to essentially unbecome.
Thanks. The red was my mistake in a way -- wrong words.
...
Yes.Do you agree that such an entity is truth?
Because, am agree with the statement below.Why ?
Yes.Do you agree that such an attainement is possible?
Expencive question, Expencive answer, I hope you are serious to purchase.How?
...Atman...
Do you agree that such an entity is truth? If not why? If yes, then why?
Do you agree that such an attainement is possible? If not why? If yes, then how?
...
Are we really particulate at all times?
...
Yes.
Because, am agree with the statement below.
Yes.
Expencive question, Expencive answer, I hope you are serious to purchase.
_/\_
Chinu
Without codifying another religion, yes.
Not without seeing the merchandise.
I think you have written, " Not ", in hurry ?
_/\_
Chinu
lol or in jest
The Lord Himself is the merchandise, and He Himself is the trader.
- Guru Nanak Dev
I cannot imagine that some compare god to merchandise and trader (bania in Hindi)? ...
1. Yes, since my understanding is that Atman is One and the same as Absolute Reality/Absolute Truth.
2. Yes, by absolute realization of what and who one really is.
Perhaps, but certainly not free from change.
This is not exactly true. It can feel sorrow if it wishes, but it is also sinister in the respect that it implies sorrow is bad. Sorrow, like the atman, is part of what makes us human.
Thus the perceptual difficulties in complexity of concept; "true" and "life."When the waking state form was not true before birth and will not be true after death...
Now....is the perception of this state all that there is?
No, I am quite insistent on this point, those who say Atman/soul does not change don't know what they are talking about. Atman is sort of like a spinning top. Due to the spin the colour appears to be uniform, in the same way, Atman only appears to be changeless due to the limitations of human perception. It changes so fast, that it is all a blur and seems therefore to be changeless. Obviously I don't particularly care what so-called "scripture", or anyone else, have to say to the contrary.By scriptural definition, Atman is free of change and sorrow. Possibly, the verse and the opinion here pertain to different things?
...
In the act of living, the act of being true occurs before the word; truth.
Now.
No, I am quite insistent on this point, ---It changes so fast, that it is all a blur and seems therefore to be changeless. ---
How else would I know to make the point? For the record, it is constant change. Spinning was a feature of the analogy.Did you see or know it spinning?
...