Meh. I'm not convinced that even staring in the face of overwhelming evidence that god existed, everyone would believe it. There's overwhelming evidence the earth is round, yet flat earthers are a thing. People are quick to cling to their own biases as fact, and they are great at molding their perceptions of reality to conform with what they already accept as plausible. That's the power of delusion, and all are susceptible to delusion to some degree.
That said, that form of communication from god would certainly be enough evidence to convince me -for the time being. In the future, this may be able to be replicated via technological advancements.
As for if god would do that, I can't pretend to see into the mind of a being that I haven't seen enough proof to believe that he exists in the firstplace. What's more, even though I'm sure I can get a good idea of what someone's motives may be if I know them well, I can't pretend to know what they would and would not do exactly -though I can make an educated guess.
For me, I guess the questions would be "Which god," and "Why does this god care if I believe in his/her/it's existence?" What does this god have to gain by this? Why would he prefer people clinging to blind faith rather than relying on hard evidence? Doesn't make much sense to me.
If god exists, he has a very hands off opproach to his interaction with the world. What use have I for a god that doesn't really do much?
If a God existed, then why would science as a human think that a God would allow them to take its power and convert them into a resource for a human technology?
Would make no sense factually.
But if a human male, who invented the acts science said that he wanted to change his life by changing God, the powers, would make more sense, seeing he always said God was a male/man and a he...as a living human male as a he owning a penis to say I am he/man and male.
Now if you use information factually as a thinker and a human, give all details names/evaluations, including bodies in space, as separate to Earth...and claim that you gave self, the egotist, personal human rights to do such acts and thoughts...then who do you really think you are?
You know male, human scientist, as a male who takes control/order and manipulates by group coercive male choices?
Who says I own all the rights to everything else, and really believes it, just as a human male......and consciousness in spiritual males had enough of you in the past, just as they will again in modern day life....as the Destroyer of life...the occult scientists.
He lives on a stone planet, that he personally as a male group said was God the body of. But then said as a living human male group....and I own it all and named it all to force change it.
And today talks about the Big bang that gave him his life today.
And yet says, once God (inferring to male self) was a higher superior life form...as original science male self in his own past....inventor of the Big bang in the Universe.
The state he said was a UFO WAR, that he activated as a male scientist on Earth.
Knowingly.
For as consciousness does not exist before presence of self. For a male to think back to a higher past, he was the self, superior to self today in that past who did it.
Changed the natural Universe, which no male factually in personal truth would be enabled to say...when the created body did not exist....for he would own no details to use inference with.
As what we termed described his male science theories/activities as....Satanism...how to change God O the mass into particles by a black hole opening removal of mass, the history of...gas/spirit into the deep pit of empty space.
What he knew he did....and knew it all got frozen, the star fall, frozen, the UFO particle attack on God...frozen, and he wants to restart the collapse of the Sun....when the Universe had stopped it.
His machine, which is science itself......began its themed journey from mineral particles, fused, heated/converted and melted and cooled....as origins of thinking for science...where science itself began. Which most of you today seem to completely ignore as being relevant proof to self that you are all liars in science.
Flat Earth theorists claim that there is no space, therefore science could not exist, for they would not be enabled to form shifting of mass, for you would have nowhere to shift it.
Mass shifted is already mind notification to claim I know....by the history of huge radiation mass that shifted mass into particles or grains of chemicals/minerals...which you also seem to ignore the natural history of...a Sun attacking a mass.
For gas mass originally formed crystalline fusion...and the Sun attacked God O Earth as the first science researcher told self......how he knew what to copy to apply conversion or transformation through destruction.
As he always said O God was mass and a planet/stone, if he says today that God is a particle, then he wants to convert God and shift God as mass into that particle his own self....by radiation knowledge.
If a male says God in science, then God in science cannot be a Deity, for the Deity that he presumes is more powerful than the natural history Universe is a human being male scientist.