The man gives the seed: the woman nourishes it in her womb.
This is the law of nature.
The Lord Jesus Christ provided the Seed, His Word.
Mixed. I think that I agree partly. I don't follow the argument in the OP.
I think that the practice of men in tribal and priestly leadership is Jewish, but there are no hard rules about who can prophesy or who can be wise. There are areas of the NT that fit the OP partially, but I can think of examples of NT passages that do not fit with the OP.
Genesis 3:16 "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and
her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel." Its significant that the seed comes from a woman, and this has a prominent place in Christian discussions about the Logos.
Galatians 4:6 "And because
ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father." This is inclusive of the sisters. All are Sons in this terminology.
The twelve apostles have to be men, because they are the apostles to the Jews all over the world. Their commission is finished, and that is recorded at the end of Mark 16. After them comes a new effort to reach non-Jews, starting with Paul and Barnabas but not limited to them. The non-Jewish apostles can be women and men. Romans 16:1 lists a female deacon. Also manuscript studies may indicate that there is a female apostle, Junia, mentioned in Romans 16:7 (Ehrman's
Misquoting Jesus) but that someone decided after the fact to consider Junia to be a male for political reasons.
A relevant passage that does not contradict the OP is 1 Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a woman to teach or assume authority over a man..." but is a far cry from saying all that stuff about seed, because women have the same seed planted when they hear.
Also I don't think that this is a huge matter. It could matter, sometimes. If we look at all the problems with preaching, most problems are not because females are preaching. Most problems are not specific to the sex of the speakers.
The archbishop in the video is not getting his point across well, because his explanation is not explaining. He's giving an opinion, but the stuff about the seed is not working. He's putting forward a mystery or a parable, but he's not explaining it. Its not an explanation more of a restatement of this material from 1 Timothy 2 which people wonder about to this day. A bride represents the church, and a husband represents Christ yet both are part of the church and are in Christ, therefore the reasoning is not apparent. To *really* go into what Timothy is talking about would probably require backtracking into Jewish teachings about marriage, why their women wear headcoverings, why they sit on opposite sites etc etc.