This is wrong. When I step onto a plane, I have faith/hope that it will not crash in transit, but it is not blind faith. My faith in the plane is based on evidence, such as the probability that the plane will crash (determined by statistically calculating how many planes crash each year over how many flights take off in total) which is very small, the fact that this particular plane has passed mechanical and technical inspections, and that my pilot has completed rigorous aviation training. All the evidence suggests that this flight should be unconventional and safe, and so I have trust that it will be so based on that hard evidence.
Who said believing in God is blind faith ,you obviously have'nt expereinced God's hand in your life nor comprehended the world around you and you apparently have'nt heard some of your own evolutionists ,atheists and agnostic scientists claim the probabilities of the complexities of this universe and all life coming together by random chance are out of this world, this includes Dawkins, but I'm sure we'll never hear the reservations he had with the age old evolutionary theory regarding random chance and natural selection.
I would pull quotes from some famous scientists concerning their own doubts concerning the theory of evolution but we would be playing tennis until Jesus returns.
The assumption of such stats that you rely on are only that,they are not fact ,so you remain in faith relying in the percision of the mechanics, the equipment,slight chance of fatality, oh, then there is the enviromental conditions to contend with.
That evidence is circumstantial at best, specifically at the moment of inspection.
I suggest you look around you and consider the same probabilities of creation by intelligent design that you just stated you adhere to and stop insisting on proof for God, something that you yourself can't even possess to function on a daily basis.
When you choose to believe in the supernatural, you are doing so based on blind faith, because there is no evidence to suggest that it is true. In fact, you could argue that the evidence points away from the supernatural.
Not only have I had an ecounter with God through the power of his Holy Spirit, but the evidence of nature,the human eye,the atmosphere 7 percise mixture of gases, carbon formation, the positioning of the sun and the moon from the earth ,the axis of the earth in proportion to the sun, the hydrological cycle, the hummingbird itself is a wonder to many scientists, the heart beat.
Next time you take a breath thank the God lord for giving it to you, it could be your last, you just don't know, we all just don't know what awaits us around any given corner.
If that is not living according to blind faith ,this conversation is over.
The fact remains that creationism does not contain any testable hypotheses, and therefore is pretty much as far from science as you can get
If you call evolving from inanimate matter testable ,:banghead3