mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Are they exhibiting a dictatorship-like authoritarianism when they choose who they censor? Is that "free market"? Or more like a communistic market?
It is a free market.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are they exhibiting a dictatorship-like authoritarianism when they choose who they censor? Is that "free market"? Or more like a communistic market?
"free" is the key.It is a free market.
"free" is the key.![]()
I your rules... just for me or is it consistent for everyone..No. it is not. You are not free to do what you want in an exchange with another human.
So here it is: I offered you a deal. You can use my webservice if you follow my rules on the webservice, which I can make, because it is my webservice.
.
You are in effect an communist, because you oppose private property rights. So move to Cuba or learn to live in country with private property rights.
...
Say WHAAAAT?![]()
Then you haven't read all my posts. If you didn't read them all, I understand what you are saying.You don't accept that if you come to my house, that you within the constitution further have to act within my house rules. Your claim is you can behave like you want and it doesn't matter that it is my house and my property. In effect you don't accept private property and thus you are a communist.
In effect for as pointed out by others for this forum, you can behave as you please, because the owners of this site can't set rules for how you behave on this site. Well, maybe you are not a communist, but an anarchist. It is maybe, that you don't accept private or state property, but just want to do as you please.
So in other words as a minimum you don't accept at least one form of property rights.
Then you haven't read all my posts. If you didn't read them all, I understand what you are saying.
To recap... their censorship is evenly applied. If they applied their rules correctly, I would have no problem with it.
Are all companies dictatorships? They're run by a CEO/owner and everyone has to do what he/she says, no?Are they exhibiting a dictatorship-like authoritarianism when they choose who they censor? Is that "free market"? Or more like a communistic market?
I agree with the expert's whom declared its an oligarchy we live in now.I've seen social media giants censor Donald Trump and ban him entirely. Kind of like something you see in a Communist dictatorship.
So if it's possible that governments can gain excessive power to the point of over-doing it, can the same be said for the corporate world?
If so, what is the middle of these two polar opposites? Is it "the people"..? If so, do the people of the middle have a vehicle for power? If so, what is that vehicle?
It would be "communistic" if there were no alternative.Are they exhibiting a dictatorship-like authoritarianism when they choose who they censor? Is that "free market"? Or more like a communistic market?
Not really a free-market in the US anymore.
More like an oligarchy.
A few corporations controlling large shares of the market.
No.Are all companies dictatorships? They're run by a CEO/owner and everyone has to do what he/she says, no?
Is there a free market at all? Are all markets "communistic" where companies exist?![]()
Or the owners/stockholders could sell.Unions also have a say or, at the very least, people can voluntarily leave the business.
So do unions under both national and state laws.Business have to follow Governmental rules and regulations.
A robot for president ? Who controls the machines? Are the computers stealing our freedoms ? I would be happy with shorter term limits and D. Trump in leg irons...just to limit his terrible attempt at dancing on stage.Do you know what a "ballot measure" is..?
What if there was a computer program that asked specific questions, and people were allowed to describe many things... And all the opinions, of all the people were tallied up to create laws... Like what Facebook is allowed to do or not. Among other things... Would that be good or bad?
I've seen social media giants censor Donald Trump and ban him entirely. Kind of like something you see in a Communist dictatorship.
So if it's possible that governments can gain excessive power to the point of over-doing it, can the same be said for the corporate world?
If so, what is the middle of these two polar opposites? Is it "the people"..? If so, do the people of the middle have a vehicle for power? If so, what is that vehicle?