ecco
Veteran Member
Let's put this into context. You asserted...
I replied...
What testimonies of nurses? Have you presented any verifiable stories or links? No.
What doctors have routinely killed living babies? Have you presented any verifiable stories or links?
So far you have provided no evidence to support your claim that "abortions are performed past the 24th week that are not for reasons of health." None.
So here you try again...
Secondly, the article states...
Well, let's look at the article...
So, still no evidence to support your allegations, even with the help of a very biased site which posted an article with an intentionally misleading title.
I would like to see this actually enforced, and it's not, largely because fetuses born alive are killed, and abortions are performed past the 24th week that are not for reasons of health.
I replied...
The point is that you have not shown any evidence that this is being violated. You have not shown that "abortions are performed past the 24th week that are not for reasons of health".
Are you saying that you don't believe such things are going on? Despite the testimonies of women who come forward to say that they did this? Despite the testimonies of nurses?
What testimonies of nurses? Have you presented any verifiable stories or links? No.
And what do you have to say about the doctors who routinely killed living babies who survive abortions? I have yet to see any response from you or anyone else on this thread about this.
What doctors have routinely killed living babies? Have you presented any verifiable stories or links?
So far you have provided no evidence to support your claim that "abortions are performed past the 24th week that are not for reasons of health." None.
So here you try again...
First off, your link is to a very biased site:"According to a study by the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, none of the women they surveyed who were seeking late-term abortion were doing so due to a medical issue. None of the women were aborting due to a health risk to themselves or due to a prenatal diagnosis of their preborn child. Each of the women was seeking an abortion after 20 weeks gestation because she simply did not want to have a baby."Women admit to late-term abortion because they didn't know they were pregnant
WHO WE ARE:
Live Action News is the publishing arm of Live Action, publishing pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective. Live Action is an organization dedicated to building a culture of life and advancing human rights. Live Action uses powerful and dynamic media platforms to educate the public about the humanity of the preborn and investigative journalism to expose the threats against the vulnerable and defenseless.
Live Action News is the publishing arm of Live Action, publishing pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective. Live Action is an organization dedicated to building a culture of life and advancing human rights. Live Action uses powerful and dynamic media platforms to educate the public about the humanity of the preborn and investigative journalism to expose the threats against the vulnerable and defenseless.
Secondly, the article states...
According to a study by the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, none of the women they surveyed who were seeking late-term abortion were doing so due to a medical issue. None of the women were aborting due to a health risk to themselves or due to a prenatal diagnosis of their preborn child. Each of the women was seeking an abortion after 20 weeks gestation because she simply did not want to have a baby.
Well, let's look at the article...
Why women present for abortions after 20 weeks.
There have been huge improvements in access to abortion services over the past decade, and today more than 80% of terminations are performed at under 10 weeks gestation, compared to 67% in 2005. However the proportion of abortions performed after 20 weeks (and before the legal limit of 24 weeks) has remained stable over that same period, accounting for between 1 to 2% of all terminations performed.
Did you notice the part I colored red?
So, still no evidence to support your allegations, even with the help of a very biased site which posted an article with an intentionally misleading title.