SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
It depends on whether she cannot take it or that she won't take it because it supposedly makes you gain weight.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It depends on whether she cannot take it or that she won't take it because it supposedly makes you gain weight.
That would be her business.It depends on whether she cannot take it or that she won't take it because it supposedly makes you gain weight.
That would be her business.
No one else's.
So you want to weigh in on other women'sSince here it's the State that pays for abortions, it's my business too.
So you want to weigh in on other women's
decisions about abortions, eh. Is it also
thus with everything you might pay for, eg,
dentistry, colonoscopies, vasectomies,
hearing aids, prosthetics, fixing bunions?
You'd have to ask each individual.I fully understand American women's plight. And I defend the right to have abortion.
If a were a lawmaker, and I made hormonal pills available and for free (paid for by the State), would they take it?
You'd have to ask each individual.
With 100% perfect use. Who is perfect enough to follow all directions perfectly 100% of the time?
Are Birth Control Pills Effective? | Do Birth Control Pills Work?
"If you use it perfectly, the pill is 99% effective. But people aren’t perfect and it’s easy to forget or miss pills — so in reality the pill is about 93% effective. That means about 7 out of 100 pill users get pregnant each year."
Edited for more stats:
" (*)Perfect use: more than 99% effective. Fewer than 1 in 100 women will get pregnant in a year when using the combined pill correctly.
(*)Typical use: around 91% effective. Around 9 in 100 women using the combined pill will get pregnant in a year."
How effective is contraception at preventing pregnancy?.
Interesting that you assume those that practice abstinence don't do it for their own personal benefit but because they want to judge others. Interesting but probably wrong. Most people do things out of self interest.It's an uptight, holier than thou sort of nonsense. A cheap, easy way to judge others to feel better about one's own pathetic lack of self-esteem and pad and protect the frail and fragile ego from reality and the essence of being human (which in itself is often a bad thing to these sorts).
Haven't they though? Actually European countries have more restricted abortion laws than America.And good thing we don't heed your warnings, because we'll be fine like every other country that does this and hasn't faced divine judgement.
When people have rights, this can meanThe opposite is anarchy.
That is, example: ...a 13 year old girl has free access to abortion.
She asks for it, she gets it after two seconds.
And the protocol is don't ask, don't tell: that it's her father who forced her to have an abortion, because he had got her pregnant, after raping her. Or even after a consensual, incestuous sexual act.
Some prefer fascism.
Canada hasn't had any laws restricting abortion since 1988.Haven't they though? Actually European countries have more restricted abortion laws than America.
China, where abortion on demand is allowed, as well as some major human rights violations by their government, has had major crisis lately.
Umm no they don’t.Haven't they though? Actually European countries have more restricted abortion laws than America.
China, where abortion on demand is allowed, as well as some major human rights violations by their government, has had major crisis lately.
Neither America or Europe have a unifying, single abortion law. American states are a mixed bag of results as are European ones, though they tend to be more permissive than many American states.Haven't they though? Actually European countries have more restricted abortion laws than America.
China also has a dictator with centralized and supreme power as its head of state. That's not a divine judgement, it's a long series of events in history and a situation that comes with terrible corruption and abuse. Those things go hand in hand the same way crime and drug abuse coexist with poverty.China, where abortion on demand is allowed, as well as some major human rights violations by their government, has had major crisis lately.
If countries with abortion prohibitionChina, where abortion on demand is allowed, as well as some major human rights violations by their government, has had major crisis lately.
I said nothing about those practicing, but those yammering on about an expectation for others. Like inevitably happens with discussions on abortion, where personal responsibility and abstinence will fix the whole thing.Interesting that you assume those that practice abstinence don't do it for their own personal benefit but because they want to judge others. Interesting but probably wrong. Most people do things out of self interest.
Well I mean I think Poland isn’t exactly a utopia and they have criminalised abortion (except for the health of the mother.)If countries with abortion prohibition
havs experienced crises, that would
seem to disprove your claim, eh.
Nah. Jehovah does have a long list of stuff we aren't supposed to do that anger him, so if they prohibit abortion they're still doing something to provoke his "righteous judgment" and fury and wrath. It is, after all, said that this god is angry and he holds us sinners in his hands and he's looking for any excuse he can find to fling us into Hell.If countries with abortion prohibition
havs experienced crises, that would
seem to disprove your claim, eh.