Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You are speaking to someone who understands what the mind in a state of non-duality is about, to observe the machinations of a dualistic mind finding that such a state could be realized unbelievable, is entertaining.
No, I am talking to someone that claims to understand what the min in a state of non-duality is about.
Haha, by that logic, the one who claim to understand what the non-dual mind state is about, is talking to someone who claims to understand logic. Either both are correct, or one or the other right and the other wrong, or both wrong.
Sorry, no.. You have demonstrated that you are not reasoning logically. Let's drop your dualistic mind nonsense for the time being. Let's try to work on your inability to use logic and reasoning. It will make you a better debater.
So you do not understand logic, did you not ever do Venn diagrams and Boolean Algebra?
You seem to be saying that due to your claimed non-dualism that you cannot reason rationally. And you might be right about that.
It is as explained, if you do not understand Venn Diagrams, say so and another way of explanation will be employed.
No, I understand them fine. It seemed that you were claiming not to understand them. But them maybe your are not a non-dualist after all.
Ok SZ, nanny nap time for ben d, non-dualism here I come.
Its really about money.For Biden and Trumps sake I hope they do not.The campaign trail is arduous.However the Republicans need a treasure chest to buy advertising time and other.Trump has sources which means he has a big advantage over the others and why I think he will win. Money talks.
That's just lazy cynicism. Voters vote for reasons. Party managers know that.
I wish you were right, but he and his staunch supporters still dominate the Pub Party.
From what I read, most Republican voters now prefer De Sanity Clause. And for Trump things will only get worse once he is indicted. There won't be enough diehards.
I'm very far from being sure he'd be any improvement, especially when you look at the antics he and Abbott have been using.
I live in the here and now, ie., what is, is. If DJT comes back and wins, so be it. Whoever wins, so be it.
The assessments I have heard is that DeSantis lacks the ability to manupulare voter emotions like Trump does. DeSantis' policies are certainly vile so it remains to be seen what the conservative voter likes, and what sways the moderates. I doubt Trump has a future in politics, and I can't see him risk more humiliation by losing yet again. The real question is whether Biden will run again. If he does I think it is an advantage for the republican nominee.
Yes, I fear Biden will run again, at 82 years old, playing into the hands of De Sanity Clause. Surely the Democrats have to skip a generation and find someone more dynamic, with charisma and a plan.
I don't think age is a huge problem. It is apparent that Biden has lost a step or two since he was vice prez. And presidents aren't kings, they have a staff that does most of the work. Look at Reagan fading in his last few years, and things didn't fall apart. My concern is the fear of Biden failing and using it to persuade swing voters towards a republican nominee, and I don't see many that would be good for the USA and the world at the moment. The republicans as a whole are so far right these days that even moderate democrats are conservative.
Oddly enough, Buttigeig is the person I thought - from across the pond admittedly - was the man I'd have voted for. Fabulous CV, good speechmaker, seems competent and very experienced for a man of his age..... But evidently the Dems thought a gay man was a bridge too far for conservative black voters in the Bible Belt, or something. I think I agree about Harris: the absolutely last thing they should do is pick someone who gives the impression of thinking he or she is owed the office on the basis of ticking the right progressive boxes. That would be Clinton 2.0. It's noticeable that our Trumpy trolls on this forum have spent a lot of time trying to trash Harris, presumably because they think she might be the candidate if Biden doesn't run. But I've an awful feeling the Dems may have already boxed themselves in to choosing either Biden or Harris.
I tend to agree with you, but there's been times when the Pubs overplayed their hand and it backfired on them.