I appreciate the good faith effort of the list here. Several of the questions would be quite helpful, I agree.
I would say, though, that 1., 2., 5., and 12. are unnecessary. Gods are irrelevant to an assessment of whether evolution is true. Indeed, many theists believe in evolution, and have even been evolutionary scientists who have advanced our understanding of the topic. So while defining God is helpful in another debate, it's not needed here.
Next, whether Darwin was a highly qualified genius or a clueless idiot is irrelevant to whether evolution is true. The process has been verified countless times since the man died in the 19th century.
And last, I don't need to personally perform experiments to reasonably make a conclusion on the topic. I've never personally experimented with cancer treatments, but I'm scientifically literate enough to be able to read and understand the thrust of experiments that
have been done on those treatments, and to understand how they're systematically vetted by my government for safety and effectiveness, etc.
Aside from that, I like the list.