But you could in the actual scenario in reality - i.e, a democratic election.
But not in the last election.
Not much point in answering a metaphor that has no relation to reality.
Afraid to answer, eh.
No Hillary supporter has yet done so.
Their political house of cards would collapse if they did.
Nope, because you can refuse to vote for anyone. You needn't support anyone in the race.
To refuse to vote is to ensure the win of the candidate who leads.
This too is a kind of support.
Thus, you are a Hillary supporter, even if you didn't vote for her.
Another sneaky trick to avoid the subject actually being discussed by shifting it elsewhere.
It's a sneaky trick designed to illuminate your sneaky trick.
Fact is, you voted for a sexist, racist oligarch.
And you supported a corrupt, sexist, murderous, hawkish, rape enabler to win.
If I support Trump & all his actions, then by your rationale,
you support Hillary & all her actions.
Except that's not the rationale. Perhaps it's too nuanced for you to follow....
Actually, you cannot face being hoist with your own petard,
so you apply a double standard which exculpates you.
....so you ascribe a lot of things to it that were never even implied.
The pot calling the kettle black syndrome.
The only difference between us is that you're sincere in your
mischievously irrational rationale. While I only employ your
methods to show how disingenuous & wrong they are.
Since you obviously really like having your questions answered, perhaps you could answer this one:
You want to pose one....after refusing to answer mine?
No, I can't reward such behavior.
You answer the challenge I posed first.
And after a genuine answer, you may pose your question again.
....you have essentially said "This is the person I personally wish to see in power". That is support. That you showed. To a clearly unfit person to hold power.
That is a dishonest rephrasing of what I've said about my vote.
And this desperate back-peddling of "Well, I only voted for him as the lesser of two evils" is just a cowardly way of avoiding sticking by the actual position you took in the election and avoid any responsibility for your decision to elect an obviously incompetent, racist, sexist oligarch.
Again, you're being dishonest.
This is because even before I voted, I described him as the lesser of 2 evils.
It appears that you're now trying to spin history out of shame for your
supporting corruption, wrongful war, incompetence, rape enabling, & crony capitalism.
Your not owning up to your support is (as some here would say) cowardice.
Notice:
I'm just applying your rationale.
It's not that I actually find it cromulent.