I think there are probably several ways to express this. I see what you are saying as "Name" symbolizing all the highest, divine qualities in us that is provoked through inspiration in such high, archetypal symbols. "God", or "Brahman", inspires an image of the divine within us, and thus connects us with our highest Self, or that which is beyond the small egoic self as the center of our own existence, and is found in everything that exists. It need not be pronounced, or named, as that can change it from That which is all-encompassing, to an "it" or an object of curiosity.
But once named, therein lies the danger. "The Tao that can be named, is not the Tao". Making God an object for discussion, reduces it to nothing more than an extension of our own egos, a discussion or our ideas about God. Not an expression of the being of God, in our own being in the world. That's not named, that's danced.
The "Name" is a metaphor for the Self, that we look to in hopes to find Who we always have been.