Smart Gun technology. I think its time it arrives in the US without restrictions to the 2nd amend

[Revoltingest]

Yeah, if you just could learn the is-ought problem and don't claim a "we" that is not there.

I don't know what that means.
Please don't explain.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I don't know what that means.
Please don't explain.

I won't explain it. Just note that is standard skepticism and connected to this:
https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/whatisscience_12

So since you understand science, you should know this.

 

[Revoltingest]

I won't explain it. Just note that is standard skepticism and connected to this:
https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/whatisscience_12

So since you understand science, you should know this.

Tis like telling a kid not to put beans up his nose.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Tis like telling a kid not to put beans up his nose.

Another of your evitation. But I accept they work for you.

 

[Revoltingest]

Another of your evitation. But I accept they work for you.

Is that the Danish word for beans up your nose?

 

[Truth in love]

First some information...

Here’s What’s Up With "Smart Guns" — And Why You Can’t Buy One In The US

I think this could provide a fairly practical solution, not affect 2nd amendment rights, and wouldn't restrict legitimate buyers further than what we have now in terms of regulations to obtain a firearm legally.

I really like the idea that such firearms cannot be 'borrowed' by other people aside from its rightful owner. It includes law enforcement officers at well as in cases of disarming the weapon cannot be trained back on the officer by a criminal.

I think that alone will reduce the repeated tragedy of mass killings by firearms.

What do you think?

Its at best a fair compromise that I hope both Democrats and Republicans can agree on at the table. I'm sure the public would appreciate a type of safety without a loss of rights for an individual.

Let's make it happen!

People can get the tech if they want, but to require it would be unlawful.