Let me be crystal clear when I say it's not okay under any instance.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Regarding the Filtering of Profanity
- Thread starter JustGeorge
- Start date
Preferably fully cooked.That surely depends on precisely how it is given to them.
And some sauerkraut would be nice.
One forum I use allows profanity.
It hasn't gotten out of hand.
But that's because of moderation.
RF has actually lightened up on restrictions.
Some old rules prohibited using the word, "fist".
And banned pix of bare chested males.
The forum has improved during my reign
as top jerk.
Actually, I remember those daysHere comes the soap, Mr Potty Mouth!
Make that all asterisks, buddy.
Drop that "s"!
Plurality is OK. It would be different if the s was at the beginning of the word.
That's not the rule, bub.
Moreover, using the "s" to make a plural
suggests the word because some words
are made plural in other ways.
Consider that the plural of **** is ****.
See....there's no "s" at then end of ****.
Sure it is. Adding an s at the end of the word doesn't make it any easier to guess what it is.
And I know that personally anytime I've had the moderate something that the filter didn't catch, if there were an 's' at the end of it to indicate plurality I would leave the s even if I asterixed everything else out.
Yes, it suggests that it may be one of any of the 149,165 words in the English language that are spelled with 4 letters, only 29 of which are considered profane (thank you AI).
You'll have to fight this out with @JustGeorge.
She posted....
"Please allow our filter to do its job by catching the entire profane word."
The "s" is part of the entire word.
I pity the fool who dares cross her.
I pity the fool, too, but @Quagmire is right.
The S merely makes the profane word plural, and is neutral itself.
Its not there to deliver the ****, its just there to make more of it.
As you stated the rule, the "entire" word must be asterisked out.
Of course, you make perfect sense about the "s" being inoffensive.
But rules is rules. Obey without question or exception.
Dang...now I'm the fool who crossed you.
But you started it by crossing yourself.
I can kick my own butt. And I'm well aware I qualify for a fool....
Ain't we a pair.
Alien826
No religious beliefs
That's quite a contortionist act.
My father had a silly joke. He would say "I know someone who bit himself in the backside". Then "He put his dentures in his back pocket and sat down too quickly".
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
What sometimes drives me nuts is when a supposed profanity is inside a perfectly good word. See if you can guess what I am complaining about: