Islam said:
Moon women Im dizzy from what uve said ur going everywhere. But no, if Jesus isnt the son of God which he isnt, that doesnt mean he was a lunatic God forbid or a liar. He never claimed to be. But to sum it up for you:
"No man hath seen God at any time (John 1: 18)
" (God) whom no man hath seen, nor can see .,."I TIMOTHY 6:16
John clarifies that He is indicating the Father there later on in his Gospel, as I already pointed out and you gave no response to. Once again, if no man has seen the Father, but people have clearly seen God, who did they see? This is no contradiction as Muslims are so quick to conclude, but merely requires a bit of critical thinking.
Job 25:4-6 (New King James Version)
4 How then can man be righteous before God?
Or how can he be pure who is born of a woman?
5 If even the moon does not shine,
And the stars are not pure in His sight, 6 How much less man, who is a maggot,
And a son of man, who is a worm?
This is indicative of a general principle about universal sin. It does not invalidate the deity of Christ in any way. You're not seriously claiming that, according to this verse, no human can EVER be pure or righteous, are you? Do you really, honestly think that's what this is is saying that that is the historical interpretation of this passage?
You see YOU have made Jesus into a God. He never claimed to be. And than you say well if he wasnt God than he was a liar. Noo, it just means that you have been decieved by your scholars, starting with Paul the man who contradicts Jesus himself thousands of time.
And yet you just quoted him to attempt to demonstrate your "contradiction" about God never being seen...if he's such a liar, stop quoting him.
Jesus informed the child that his sins are forgiven. If I tell someone there debt is cancelled that doesnt mean I cancelled it. And Muslims do not belive that the Bible we have today is the exact same word of God bestowed upon Jesus. We believe the Bible is corrupt, simple proof is its contradictions and absurdities and erotic stories.
The context of the passage makes it clear that He wasn't simply announcing the forgiveness without bestowing it. When the people question how He could forgive sins, He responded, "What is easier, to forgive sins or to heal a lame man?" (paraphrased) and then proceeded to heal the man before Him. If He healed the man, which is clear, then there is no reason to assume that He didn't also forgive the same man's sins, and only God can forgive sins.
Thomas wasnt talking to Jesus. Thomas being the doubtfull that he was, was shocked when he saw Jesus so cried out in shock oh my God! Not adressing Jesus but adressing God. As we would say today, OMG!
Thomas did not merely say, "Oh my God!" (Jews in that time would never use the term God in that way as we do in modern English-speaking societies today). The text says quite plainly that Thomas answered Jesus as said TO HIM: "My Lord and My God!" (John 20:28) The text plainly testifies to the fact that Thomas was speaking to Jesus. Jesus was and is Thomas' Lord and God.
The book of Rev was no more then a dream John had. It speaks of creatures with eyes on the inside and eyes on the outside. Sometimes when you have a little too much to eat this happens.
And the Quran was no more than a book of stories and teachings from Muhammad after claiming to receive a vision from an angel. Millions of people have claimied to have had visions. See how easy it is to paint with such big, broad strokes?
Was this written by Jesus? No, by Paul. Paul the problem. He tells u in his book to believe whatever Paul tells you to believe, think whatever he tells you to think, and do whatever he tells you to do.
4:9 WHo is he?! He was one of the most people who HATED JESUS the he claimed to have herd Jesus's voice so he converted to Christianity AS HE CLAIMS.
Ah, so obviously anyone who converts to Christianity after being opposed to it can't be trusted.