rrobs
Well-Known Member
I'm curious. What kind of healer are you? Healing is certainly a noble endeavor. I applaud you for even thinking about it.Unveiled Artist, Healer
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm curious. What kind of healer are you? Healing is certainly a noble endeavor. I applaud you for even thinking about it.Unveiled Artist, Healer
A father and a son are two distinct individuals, not somehow two people in one. Otherwise words and our concept of relationships are meaningless. That's why I keep on saying that making Jesus God makes the redemption story meaningless.
What is wrong with saying, as the scriptures do, that God sent His son, Jesus, to redeem us? Why does Jesus need to be God? Especially when the scriptures say that sin came by man and so does redemption from that sin (1 Cor 15:21). Never once does it say a god or god-man redeemed us. There is no shortage of pagan religions that make that claim, but nothing in the scriptures say anything at all like that.
By the way, have you ever noticed that in Revelations there is one throne for God and another for Jesus? No mention at all of a throne for the Holy Spirit. Poor guy must have been forgotten.
I'm curious. What kind of healer are you? Healing is certainly a noble endeavor. I applaud you for even thinking about it.
The problem is the above is not what the Trinity is about as it does not posit Jesus as being the Father (God). The belief is that Jesus is of God in a way that's not fully understandable, which is why in Catholicism it's commonly called "the mystery of the Trinity".The trinity and making Jesus God has all kinds of problems.
It makes sense to me. You just don't want to understand it. The Son is not the Father so Jesus was not his own father.Trying to discuss a trinity is impossible. Even the most ardent of Trinity scholars will freely admit it can't be understood, so let's just say Jesus is not God. He is the son of God.
That diagram makes no logical sense whatsoever. Just think about it with a clear mind for one minute.
Maybe trinity doesn't teach outright that Jesus is his own father, but if he is God and God is his father, then he is absolutely his own father. I don't know how, but somehow they dazzle people into not seeing the insanity of that doctrine.
Hi, I'm new to the forum. There is yet another way to view the trinity. We could be arguable composed of the trinity as well. We have a soul, spirit and flesh at the same time. With this line of thought think about what and how the spirit works. The spirit is the link between the flesh and the soul. It is through the spirit that we might hear or be moved in some fashion by God. If God might be representative of the soul, and Jesus representative of the flesh, the Holy Ghost might be representative of the working connection between flesh and spirit. Perhaps Jesus was indeed a needed connection between the father and his creation. Perhaps for a better connection between his creation and himself. So we also have flesh, spirit and a soul. Thus a trinity exist within us. Not the Holy Trinity but a similar trinity. Moreover, Translations are essential. We speak of God who is soul before flesh and before the need of spirit. So if he was to create the need for flesh, would his creation be considered his child much like we would consider a house we rehab our pet child? Thus to converse between flesh and soul, the spirit would need to come into existence. Just some thoughts.
The problem is the above is not what the Trinity is about as it does not posit Jesus as being the Father (God). The belief is that Jesus is of God in a way that's not fully understandable, which is why in Catholicism it's commonly called "the mystery of the Trinity".
Well, no matter how you look at it, the son of his father is not his father. Two people in every sense of the word. Not two (or three) in one, but two, period.You are a father and a son -depending on the perspective of whatever you talk about-face
You are a father to your son
You are a son to your father
You are both father and son --only in that person relates to you-. It's based on that person's perception. You are just a human being. External factors make you one and another depending on who you are comparing yourself to.
I can understand that.My religion? (I'm on default mode so I can't see people's religions and stats) I had art or creativity to heal as in take care of my physical, mental, and spiritual needs etc. Creativity to me is like scripture to a Christian. I can't live without freedom of expression.
Well, no matter how you look at it, the son of his father is not his father. Two people in every sense of the word. Not two (or three) in one, but two, period.
Yes, Jesus was of God. So are we:The problem is the above is not what the Trinity is about as it does not posit Jesus as being the Father (God). The belief is that Jesus is of God in a way that's not fully understandable, which is why in Catholicism it's commonly called "the mystery of the Trinity".
Then they are not one? OK. I misunderstood. Sorry about that. I thought you were saying they are one, unlike any other father and son.It makes sense to me. You just don't want to understand it. The Son is not the Father so Jesus was not his own father.
Maybe there is another brand of trinity I've not heard of, but I think they do in fact believe that Jesus is God. I'm pretty sure they say you can't even be born again without believing Jesus is God, that you're going to hell. That's my understanding anyway.Trinity just means relationship between three things.
Prove jesus and god dont have a relationship with each other, then you disprove the trinity.
If trinitarians believed jesus is god, they would not be trinitarians.
Well, it sounds good on the surface, but I'm wracking my mind to think of any scripture that will fit with what you said. I come up with a blank. Which verses are you thinking of?Actually very simple. There is no "person" named "God". There is a "person" named "Father" and another "person"named "Jesus". They are completely separate and different. The Father is not Jesus and Jesus is not the Father. Together they are "God".So they are two different "persons" who are both "God". Kind of like a husband and wife are two different people but they make up one family. So "God" is really like a family.
One in Essence and Substance but not the same Person. The closest way I can explain is to imagine 3 people sharing the same soul, but they each have different personalities and roles.Then they are not one? OK. I misunderstood. Sorry about that. I thought you were saying they are one, unlike any other father and son.
Maybe there is another brand of trinity I've not heard of, but I think they do in fact believe that Jesus is God. I'm pretty sure they say you can't even be born again without believing Jesus is God, that you're going to hell. That's my understanding anyway.
I'd be surprised to find out otherwise, pleasantly surprised I might add! I hate to think that professing Christians worship two gods, so if I'm wrong on that, praise God and pass the ammo! Oh wait, that's not right. Just praise God, forget the ammo!
One would wander why there is no such an explicit and clear teaching in old testament that, the Father God, has one Son God with the name of Jesus. Why God the Father did not introduce His son in old testament?No wonder you're confused. You don't even understand the basics of the Trinity concept. The Christian Trinity consists of three Persons - the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. They are not the same Persons. Jesus would be God the Son, the second Person of the Trinity. The Father would be the first Person of the Trinity. It is the Father who is commonly referred to in the Hebrew Bible, although there are parts interpreted as referencing the Trinity. So, no - Trinitarianism doesn't teach that Jesus was his own father or that he prayed to himself or whatever.