No, that is too common to be able to differentiate, it will not be classified as anything other than a conventional lifestyle. Once you deviate from that, then we have an anomaly that sets you
apart and allows a more particular definition, possibly stigmatized. In general, a musician leads a rock & roll lifestyle, an athlete a healthy lifestyle, an erudite a rather studious lifestyle, and a homosexual an unorthodox or deviant lifestyle - all of these assessments are based on things outside of the normal aspects of their daily activities (shopping, movies, exercise, concerts, work, ...).
It is the peculiar or irregular aspects of one's life that define their lifestyle - the uncommon activities. Otherwise, there's nothing noteworthy to either differentiate or categorize.
Excuse what might appear to be a callous remark, but many people have for either justified or unjustified reasons. Bui, I don't recommend on any level, that anybody desist from, or engage in, any activity that they are not convicted that there is greater merit in doling so, than by not doing so. Acting in vain, produces only frustration.
I, ideally, would like you to recognize the rather bizarre nature of your relationship, and how either remaining celibate, or learning to see the symbiotic beauty in a heterosexual relationship, would result in your betterment. I would not expect anyone to make any decision about their relationship, without gaining this realization first.
That was a miscommunicated error on my part - i meant to express the usefulness in abstinence, that is just to supplement the argument for it - since sex often leads to a form of hedonism (objectification), the less that we indulge, the better.