Sand Dancer
Crazy Cat Lady
Are you trying to be oblivious?
My concern is the promotion of acts that lead to destruction.
What destruction?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you trying to be oblivious?
My concern is the promotion of acts that lead to destruction.
Could be referring to HIV.What destruction?
Could be referring to HIV.
Well, now it is. It's still not fun to have and it's still mostly spread by unprotected sex among males in the US (along with injection drug users).That would be deeply ignorant if so, since HIV is a survivable disease with treatment, to the point it can now become undetectable and untransmittable. And lesbians have even lower rates of HIV infection than straight people.
I've generally thought the homophobic use of the word 'destruction' was about destruction of society. But who knows? It's a mindset that is largely unfamiliar to most of us.Could be referring to HIV.
I can't say for sure what he meant.I've generally thought the homophobic use of the word 'destruction' was about destruction of society. But who knows? It's a mindset that is largely unfamiliar to most of us.
Well, now it is. It's still not fun to have and it's still mostly spread by unprotected sex among males in the US (along with injection drug users).
Well, as long as the virus doesn't mutate and we're back to square one. Not partaking in high risk sexual activity would be the best choice, like not sleeping around. Many gay men seem to think that PreP is a license to be a huge ****, unfortunately.That's true. Great argument for having protected sex, including using PrEP!
Well, as long as the virus doesn't mutate and we're back to square one. Not partaking in high risk sexual activity would be the best choice, like not sleeping around. Many gay men seem to think that PreP is a license to be a huge ****, unfortunately.
Unfortunately it has made some of them lazy with condoms or other forms of protection, it's true. Viral mutations are always possible but thus far PrEP is extremely effective at preventing HIV. The bigger issue are folks on PrEP catching other STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, etc.) because they don't use other protection.
But none of this makes for a great argument against homosexuality, as homosexuality is independent of any particular sex practice.
I keep using the analogy of a motorcycle rider that rides responsibly and a motorcycle rider that’s a dick just wantonly weaving through traffic and cutting people off. The latter isn’t a good argument for why the former is somehow bad.
No, but it's a good argument against aspects of gay male culture, especially in the cities. There's a bath house just a few blocks from me.Unfortunately it has made some of them lazy with condoms or other forms of protection, it's true. Viral mutations are always possible but thus far PrEP is extremely effective at preventing HIV. The bigger issue are folks on PrEP catching other STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, etc.) because they don't use other protection.
But none of this makes for a great argument against homosexuality, as homosexuality is independent of any particular sex practice.
No, but it's a good argument against aspects of gay male culture, especially in the cities. There's a bath house just a few blocks from me.
If he does I'm sure he's simply learning by your example..Tell me do you think your churlish little insults represent your religion and god well?
People need to be restrained when it comes to actions that fall so close to hedonism. Over-eating (even temporal), over leisure, tv marathons, sex etc.. are all very enticing to over indulge. So, we must be careful as to what we justify as acceptable, permissible or non-consequential. There is a very fine line between beneficial and detrimental sometimes, that the lines often get crossed unwittingly, or apathetically.Is that the religious branch of biological and behavioural science, since I doubt you will find any of the natural sort who would entertain or support your views. Your religious bias is obvious. That is why it is brought into the argument. Without such, you might be more inclined to look at evidence impartially and without judgment, if that were possible. But like many, you are more likely not to be able to do so since religious dogma is perched on one shoulder telling you what to think.
Strong impulses that appear to be involuntary.Correlation between violence in sex and what?
You need to start showing some insight, and stop just asking simple questions as though there is no significance as to what is being said.What destruction?
Could be referring to HIV.
No, but it's a good argument against aspects of gay male culture, especially in the cities. There's a bath house just a few blocks from me.
Strong impulses that appear to be involuntary.