I see no dishonesty in Ms Mix's posts. Your comment speaks more about you.That is completely disenguous.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I see no dishonesty in Ms Mix's posts. Your comment speaks more about you.That is completely disenguous.
It's about as legitimate as anti-gay hate speech.
Would you defend someone who posted anti-gay hate speech on a blog? I assume not, since this would be something close to you.
This guys is an atheist and you're defending him because of that.
It's obvious.
That is completely disenguous.
For the sake of my mental health, I have to stop with you now.
In a related story, Singapore today sentenced an English author to jail under its "defamation" laws, which it has used to silence critics of its government. The author criticized the judiciary in a recent book. Singapore is a very diverse country, and its largest religion is Buddhist.
Meow Mix already responded for her part. I just wanted to add that in general those of us who support free speech and the LGBT community and are atheists/agnostics would also defend someone who posted anti-gay hate speech on a blog, insofar as they shouldn't be arrested because of it. Obviously, we would take issue with their actual points, but we'd support their right to say it without legal ramifications.
In other words, you assume wrong.
In the scope of world history, I think it's a pretty radical and recent idea.Is freedom really that crazy of an idea?
In the scope of world history, I think it's a pretty radical and recent idea.
i agree here. i don't understand why it has to be one or the other. i still think faith should be strong enough to withstand criticism; instead of arresting him, let's prove him wrong.
Tell people who are offended by blasphemers to grow a backbone.
Maybe we should tell the people offended by other kinds of hate --like homophobia-- to do the same. Grow a backbone, LGBT!
/sarcasm
Oh, and hatred of a religion or doctrine is NOT the same as prejudice/bigotry/hatred against a people.Maybe we should tell the people offended by other kinds of hate --like homophobia-- to do the same. Grow a backbone, LGBT!
/sarcasm
Maybe we should tell the people offended by other kinds of hate --like homophobia-- to do the same. Grow a backbone, LGBT!
/sarcasm
Gay people should have the backbone to withstand criticism and present their own arguments against it, not to ask that it be outlawed, IMO.
Gay people should have the backbone to withstand criticism and present their own arguments against it, not to ask that it be outlawed, IMO.
And why should they be a protected class?
If Muslims are going to strive for anything, then it's not going to be for your values but God willing for Islam and establishment of Islamic Shari'a. There is hope, isA.You Know when alls said and done, freedom is a new thing isn't it? and some of us are lucky to live in countries that have fought for it an embraced it.
In my country it took hundreds of years and much bloodshed to get to where we are today .
Some countries have a longer way to go than others it doesn't just happen overnight.
Who?
Auto was saying that LGBT people should have the backbone to respond to anti-gay sentiments by just proving them wrong or ignoring them, not by seeking to make being anti-gay illegal.
It is someone's right to be anti-gay if they wish as long as they aren't harming or directly inciting violence.
I'm a lesbian and I have a few friends that are staunchly anti-gay because they can draw a distinction between behavior and a person. They might tease me in a harsher way than other friends might when it comes to that, but they're still human beings with opinions that I disagree with -- but would fight for their ability to express them.