• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Nothing to see here, America.

dust1n

Zindīq
I have a question though. how easy is it to turn responsible citizens to mindless consumers? would people who are what we may call responsible citizens be a human pool for such an experiment?

I don't think it's easy for any one person to do, especially in modern times, but a totality of media probably has a lot to do with it. Advertising to children, the dumbing down of the education system, the drive by parents for financial success. How often does an American citizen get to practice being a citizen in this country? Now how often do they get to practice being a consumer?
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
What did you think of it? Do you think it ties into the subject of the OP?
To go back to my first question, I wonder if it helps me that Bernays or Anna Freud were instrumental in shaping people's ideas or consumerism in general, when it is the people themselves who should be considered the issue, not this personality or that personality.
to be honest, it still takes me a long time to form a full opinion on the documentary. it may be tied to the topic, but that is not surprising considering what we are discussing, it may be a case of guilty by association.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
To go back to my first question, I wonder if it helps me that Bernays or Anna Freud were instrumental in shaping people's ideas or consumerism in general, when it is the people themselves who should be considered the issue, not this personality or that personality.

Oh, I see. Well perhaps because people are not flawless beings capable or really needing discerning abstract truths? Are people hard-wired to consume things relentlessly as evolutionary benefit? Perhaps. Does our culture exploit our evolutionary dispositions? Often.

I think another big question is whether people are being deceived, or whether they allowing themselves to be deceived, or knowing embracing deception for ulterior, perhaps psychological, motives. Is embracing deception even possible? And this needs to be addressed before we can even address the issue of consumerism. I mean, is consumerism a beneficial or negative thing? Where does it lack or not? How do we even go about judging it's usefulness to humans to answer the question of why humans find it so enthralling? How can two different people at the same time hate consumerism and like consumerism? Are they both valid opinions?
 

Alceste

Vagabond
To go back to my first question, I wonder if it helps me that Bernays or Anna Freud were instrumental in shaping people's ideas or consumerism in general, when it is the people themselves who should be considered the issue, not this personality or that personality.
to be honest, it still takes me a long time to form a full opinion on the documentary. it may be tied to the topic, but that is not surprising considering what we are discussing, it may be a case of guilty by association.

I think Bernays couldn't do much alone, of course, but he came up with a winning idea: a model of public control that was irresistible to the entrenched powers of industry and politics. The idea of the American as a citizen, fully capable of making decisions in his own interest, given enough education, is well and truly dead now. Not just in America but in the entire globalized, consumerist world. America is the starkest example, I think.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Except most of the developed world is liberal, so why would they treat American liberals different? Oh, wait. I know, it's because America is actually more conservative than Time's reader based outside the U.S.


Maybe they realize that American liberals tend to be...well...oh never mind.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Maybe they realize that American liberals tend to be...well...oh never mind.

If the U.S. issue is different from the one received by the rest of the developed world, which tends to me more liberal than the U.S., do you honestly think it's saying something about America's liberalism? Really? How about telling us what you think made them feel it warranted the difference? What is it that the rest of the world can handle that U.S. readers cannot?

But then again, we are talking about reading, so perhaps it might not have much to do with conservatives after all. ;)
 
Last edited:

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
If the U.S. issue is different from the one received by the rest of the developed world, which tends to me more liberal than the U.S., do you honestly think it's saying something about America's liberalism? Really? How about telling us what you think made them feel it warranted the difference? What is it that the rest of the world can handle that U.S. readers cannot?

But then again, we are talking about reading, so perhaps it might not have much to do with conservatives after all. ;)
\

I wouldn't know what conservatives read.

As for myself, I wouldn't lower myself to the level of Time magazine when it comes to reading material.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
I don't understand it. There are plenty of intelligent people in the USA. Why does it constantly seem like the media is treating them like they are something less?

There are book series that are released all over the world but in the USA the title or length (shorter books) and wordings are changed to appeal to Americans.

I don't understand it.
Because here in America the government does pressure media outlets, and they want as few people as possible to get any ideas.
 

Falvlun

Earthbending Lemur
Premium Member
If anyone wants an easy way to post this on facebook, etc, here's a nice condensed version:

timearticle.jpg
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
If anyone wants an easy way to post this on facebook, etc, here's a nice condensed version:

timearticle.jpg

You'd at least think that whoever came up with this flier/poster/whatever it is would be educated enough to use proper punctuation.

OH, THE IRONY! Oh, well, let's just hope the author isn't American...
 

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
Missing comma not withstanding, I posted it on my Facebook page. It is a wonderful example of how an editor decided not to increase our anxieties by publishing a front page story that explained why anxiety could be good for us. That irony is too delicious to pass up. :p
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
I'm still trying to figure how Time magazine is even relevant.

One would think that if they truly believed that "Anxiety is good for you", they would have run the silly Revolution cover in the US.
 
Last edited:
Top