Azakel
Liebe ist für alle da
a manmade invention
So is Sin.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
a manmade invention
I think it is a very fundamental problem with Christianity. If the afterlife is so great, why have this life? Most answers seem to gloss over this concept. I did hear of a father who killed his family. His belief was that they were all bound for heaven. However, if they started to sin, one may go to hell. So he killed them and asked for forgiveness as he committed suicide. According to his beliefs, he is in heaven with his family. So he got exactly what he wanted. That is the problem with the rules as set up by Christians. It leads to cases like this because there is not a good reason why this life should be lived compared to the afterlife.I'm not sure if I'm willing to discuss that in this topic. It's another 'why do bad things happen' question. I choose to believe that life is precious, regardless of how it pales in comparison to 'life after death'. If life wasn't important than Christians should just kill themselves after they're 'saved' so they'll get to heaven quicker.
Man has to decide who gets medicine; who dies in a war; who suffers from hunger; who gets psychological help; where does medical research money go; and which children get educated. This is just another choice that mankind has to make when dealing with life.I think the major argument shouldn't be about the nature of birth, but about man's role in it. Why should man decide who is born and who is not?
But Christians often do choose death over life because the afterlife is more important. That's where martyrs come from, and those extreme cases who deny themselves or their loved ones needed medical care for religious reasons.I'm not sure if I'm willing to discuss that in this topic. It's another 'why do bad things happen' question. I choose to believe that life is precious, regardless of how it pales in comparison to 'life after death'. If life wasn't important than Christians should just kill themselves after they're 'saved' so they'll get to heaven quicker.
That is an interesting POV. Allthough I'm not sure about the egg, sperm does indeed live.Life doesn't begin at conception, it continues at conception (unless you think the egg and sperm are dead).
From the moment of conception, 46 chromosomes with 30,000 genes combine to determine all your physical characteristics; sex, facial features, body type, colour of hair, eyes and skin. Even more amazingly, intelligence and personality--the way you think and feel--were already in place within your genetic code. At the moment of conception you were essentually and uniquely you!
Life doesn't begin at conception, it continues at conception (unless you think the egg and sperm are dead).
Okay, so we've established a point, prior to sperm meeting egg, not a human. After a sperm meets and egg, human right? So prior to this point, not evil, after, evil?
Sorry, now I get it I didn't see that thing about no free will before. that is just trippy, why would God yank our free will. Certainly an unorthodox view and not based on anything i can discern about the nature of the god who created us as free.
You are aware, are you not, of the story in the Old Testament when the Ark was captured by the Philistines? It was placed in the Temple of Dagon and the next morning the statue of the Philistine God was laying prostrate before the Ark. After being put back upright by the priests it was found the next mornig prostrate again only this time headless.You know we are often hypocritical in our judgement. If one ceramic statue falls on another and breaks it we don't condemn it, if a TV fall and crushes the remote we don't say the TV was immoral even though it is more complex than the statue, but for some reason if a person kills another persons baby they are "bad". Who are we to judge after all we are a complex bunch of atoms like the TV is, if our atoms were arrranged to produce the same chemical reaction as the murderer we would not be any better. What we really need to do is find mind altering chemicals and use science to make people feel happy all the time. We also need to learn to do repairs and keep reactions going so we can live forever. amen
This is a different statement than "life begins." This is a statement that "mostly unique coding for a human is in place." (Identical twins are not completely identical due to environment.)At the moment of conception, 46 chromosomes with 30,000 genes combine to determine all your physical characteristics; sex, facial features, body type, colour of hair, eyes and skin. Even more amazingly, intelligence and personality--the way you think and feel--were already in place within your genetic code. At the moment of conception you were essentually and uniquely you!
It is when the sperm and egg meet, when the chromosomes and genes come together, a unique person if formed. Not before.
I see what you are saying, but I just don't see it the same way. I concur with the men I quoted that life begins at conception. I cannot view it as a cancer, although I understand the whole "feel like there's an alien inside me" feeling. Scripture says God knew me when I was first formed in the womb (psalm 139). God knows every sparrow that falls and every baby, even days old that is miscarried. I do not blame him for this. It is a result of the Fall under which all of creation groans and suffers. It has to do with free will and will not be like this forever. I simply feel, except for some extreme circumstances, like the mother's life being in danger, it is equivocable with murder. No matter how far developed, whether 5 days, 5 months, 5 years, or 25 or 50 years, this side or the other side of the womb, murder is murder. I know it is easily forgivable by God, I am a testimony to that, but abortion as birth-control is still wrong to me.This is a different statement than "life begins." This is a statement that "mostly unique coding for a human is in place." (Identical twins are not completely identical due to environment.)
But remember that functionally, this newly combined cell functions very much like cancer. It behaves and acts very much like cancer. If it has a "will," it is just to multiply endlessly at this point.
So what is the value of this cell? If it is by potential, then God is a horrible deity for allowing miscarriages since it destroys so much valuable potential. If it is by function, then it appears equivalent to cancer or to any animal fertalized egg, which we do not value that much.
I think what is valuable is it becoming human. As it develops and gains human-like characteristics then we give more and more value to it.
It seems you do not literally believe this since you don't believe that the sperm and egg are dead. You appear to mean something about life's potential or determined characteristics.I concur with the men I quoted that life begins at conception.
I don't want people to think I see a fertalized egg as a cancer. I just see it functioning like a cancer. At some point, its envonment and growth will change to form something more human looking. But if I look functionally at the organism, I tend to judge it more by what it is instead of what it can be. The exception would probably be if we lived in a world where birth rates were very low.I cannot view it as a cancer, although I understand the whole "feel like there's an alien inside me" feeling.
This passage just says that God was involved in your creation. It doesn't quite say what God thinks of abortion or miscarriage (though by reason, God is ok with miscarriage since he designed for it to happen).Scripture says God knew me when I was first formed in the womb (psalm 139).
I have noticed that any view you want to have can be supported by the Bible. I think this include pro-life and pro-choice. You are familiar with the pro-life versus.I know it is easily forgivable by God, I am a testimony to that, but abortion as birth-control is still wrong to me.
You know we are often hypocritical in our judgement. If one ceramic statue falls on another and breaks it we don't condemn it, if a TV fall and crushes the remote we don't say the TV was immoral even though it is more complex than the statue, but for some reason if a person kills another persons baby they are "bad". Who are we to judge after all we are a complex bunch of atoms like the TV is, if our atoms were arrranged to produce the same chemical reaction as the murderer we would not be any better. What we really need to do is find mind altering chemicals and use science to make people feel happy all the time. We also need to learn to do repairs and keep reactions going so we can live forever. amen
We indeed have free will or we would not be having this conversation.
I guess anyone can make the Bible say what they want to hear. The fact is that just as God judged the Egyptians who had not permitted hebrew babies to live, so shall he judge any nation who follows suit.It seems you do not literally believe this since you don't believe that the sperm and egg are dead. You appear to mean something about life's potential or determined characteristics.
I don't want people to think I see a fertalized egg as a cancer. I just see it functioning like a cancer. At some point, its envonment and growth will change to form something more human looking. But if I look functionally at the organism, I tend to judge it more by what it is instead of what it can be. The exception would probably be if we lived in a world where birth rates were very low.
This passage just says that God was involved in your creation. It doesn't quite say what God thinks of abortion or miscarriage (though by reason, God is ok with miscarriage since he designed for it to happen).
I have noticed that any view you want to have can be supported by the Bible. I think this include pro-life and pro-choice. You are familiar with the pro-life versus.
The pro-choice view can be gained from Leviticus 27:6 (children younger than a month had no monetary value); Numbers 3:15 (children younger than a month was not counted in a census); Ezekiel 37:8-10 (God reanimates dead soldiers who were not alive until their first breath); Genesis 2:7 (Adam becomes alive when he first breathes); Genesis 38:24 (Idraelites burned a pregnant woman and did not consider killing the innocent fetus to be bad); and Exodus 21:22-25 (pregnant woman who lost her child in a fight is a civil matter and not a "life for a life" as if she died). In addition, Ecclesiastes 6:3-5 and Ecclesiastes 4:1-3 tend to argue for quality of life over life itself. A really good write up on this is at Why Abortion is Biblical.
I am not saying you should agree with all of this. I am just trying to make a point that the Bible and Christianity is not very clear on abortion and it is really up to the individual to decide what is right and wrong.
I guess anyone can make the Bible say what they want to hear. The fact is that just as God judged the Egyptians who had not permitted hebrew babies to live, so shall he judge any nation who follows suit.
Which just goes to show that people will believe that some is All Loving when it's not. All Loving would mean that it doesn't kill just because some one messes up.
That is your concept of love. It makes me very glad that you are not running the universe.
Since God is love, He defines what love is not us.