If that's what you want to have faith in. I don't see Revelations as a spiritual book of prophesy. It's a vision, nothing more. We aren't even sure WHO wrote it. It doesn't follow the writing style or teachings of John, the disciple of Jesus. It wasn't part of the Canon used by the early Christians (Johannines, Pauline, Marconites, etc.). It's effectiveness of fear was adopted by the catholic ideology in their quest to control the thoughts of men. 144,000 sounded much more believable in the time of Domitian that were persecuting new Jews to Christianity, but since then the number has increased a thousand fold.
I see the Apocyphon of John in more spiritual aligning to the Gospel than an Apocalypse of John. The orthodox accept it as prophesy, when even Jesus said that the head of prophesy was removed with John (the Baptist. If men remained in seers and prophetics, Paul would have surely done so, which he didn't.
Everybody throughout history has their own views of when raptured events will occur or have already occurred. Revelations is nothing more than a book of confusion to argue over, meant for those of a perilous time, with no redeeming knowledge of the kingdom of God.
Just my researched view.