1. Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is your mysticism apophatic or cataphatic?

Discussion in 'Mysticism DIR' started by Orbit, Jul 4, 2016.

  1. Orbit

    Orbit I'm a planet

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,335
    Ratings:
    +1,078
    Religion:
    Dinner
    DIR denizens:
    Apophatic theology says God cannot be described or even truly comprehended by humans.
    Cataphatic theology says the opposite and assigns specific traits to God.

    In seeking union with the divine, which approach do you have in mind? What influenced your decision?
    Note: I am using "God" here to mean either God, the Absolute, the Divine, Brahman, the Higher Self, or however you conceptualize what you are seeking mystic union with.
     
  2. beenherebeforeagain

    beenherebeforeagain Rogue Animist
    Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,734
    Ratings:
    +4,745
    Religion:
    Modern Animist
    I think Apophatic.
    While I have experienced "union" with my environment, I intellectually recognize that the environment that I can perceive is a very small part of a much, much larger cosmos, so whatever deity there is/might be, I doubt I would be able to fully perceive or conceive of it. So, I seek mystic union with my environment, however much of it I can manage to unite with, and pretty much leave it at that.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. George-ananda

    George-ananda Advaita Vedanta and Spiritualist and Pantheist
    Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    13,654
    Ratings:
    +4,721
    Religion:
    Advaita and Spiritualist and Pantheist
    I don't personally have mystical experiences (unfortunately) but I assumed they would be apophatic. I am curious to see if anyone answers cataphatic and hear what they would have to say about that.
     
  4. crossfire

    crossfire Antinomian feminist heretic freak ☿
    Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Messages:
    9,829
    Ratings:
    +3,132
    Religion:
    ☿ Mercuræn Buddhist & Ordained Pastafarian
    Apophatic, for sanity's sake.
     
  5. Vinayaka

    Vinayaka devotee
    Premium Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    27,095
    Ratings:
    +11,472
    Religion:
    Saivite Hindu
    For me it's both. Why limit God (or mystic experiences) to either having form, or to not having form. It's summed up in a statement of faith. "God Siva is Immanent Love and transcendent reality"
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Windwalker

    Windwalker Integralist
    Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    7,700
    Ratings:
    +3,784
    Religion:
    Love, Light, and Life
    I tend more to go with Cataphatic. But when it starts to get in the way, then clear the table and go Apophatic. :)

    The reason is really more what I am more familiar with, which is envisioning God with attributes. It's complex why that is, but it has something to do with some terribly deep psychological thing with me. To envision Absolute Love, allows me to experience that Absolute Love, and thus realizing it within myself. I have a saying that captures this. "When we accept ourselves with the acceptance of God, we accept ourselves to God". What that translates into is Freedom, to express our deepest creativity, our deepest genius. What holds us back from truly Loving, has everything to do with how free we are within our own Joy. If we don't know that, we don't truly know Life.

    So God "with qualities" is what is presenting something to our psyche. That "something" opens us to that Creativity within us, which is normally blocked by the psyche in its self-contraction from its own liberation in the face of Life, when it 'surrenders' itself to Love itself. That can only be done by allowing an image of the divine to guide one along its path to Itself.

    Where Apophatic comes in for me is when I have that nasty habit of bringing expectations with me into meditation. :) What was opened to us in meditation through what are really spontaneous images of the divine (Cataphatic), becomes something we sit down and start looking for again, which is in fact not spontaneous but deliberate and forced. This is what coming in with expectations creates. So to get rid of that projecting God from the ego (which is exactly what that is), it's good to clear the slate, to dump your expectations outside at the door. Empty yourself to God, without expectation, without hopes, fears, without desire, without thought. God is not what you think. You die to all of that in you and let go into the Void. And in doing this, you become open to that which is beyond thought, beyond attributes. It is the Ocean out of which God arises.

    And then you become God, and that's that.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Orbit

    Orbit I'm a planet

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,335
    Ratings:
    +1,078
    Religion:
    Dinner
    I guess I am Cataphatic, but in the abstract. I assign love as an attribute of God, actually as THE attribute. Otherwise I am Apophatic because I don't think God can be comprehended by humans.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  8. Spurs

    Spurs Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2016
    Messages:
    26
    Ratings:
    +8
    Religion:
    Catholic
    I believe from experiences that there is infinite levels of existence and I think gods attributes are one of those levels all though they are below infinite other levels I think that God does have attributes just that only an infinitely small amount of them can be even defined by humans and even those definitions are not even close to how great they are in God I don't think that Gods attributes define him as our attributes define us but because of his ultimate infinitude they are simply a single part of him (so apophatic)
     
  9. Manoah

    Manoah Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2018
    Messages:
    68
    Ratings:
    +58
    Religion:
    Perennialistic Christian Mystic
    The apophatic [ ] of God may be splayed through the prism of humanity into a beautiful rainbow of various cataphatic traditions, systems, and practices. But this statement seems a bit cataphatic in and of itself!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Marcion

    Marcion Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    981
    Ratings:
    +448
    Definitely apophatic. God for me is the Ultimate Subject and can never be one of my objects. He knows everything about me, but I can know nothing about Him, well not objectively anyway.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Jumi

    Jumi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2014
    Messages:
    9,881
    Ratings:
    +5,443
    Religion:
    Secular theist (none)
    Apophatic seems more useful at least.
     
  12. LuisDantas

    LuisDantas Aura of atheification
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    44,710
    Ratings:
    +13,542
    Religion:
    Advocate of letting go of theism. Buddhist with an emphasis on personal understanding.
    Personally, I don't do God.

    The apophatic perspective does however make more sense as a way of dealing with the Sacred.

    A cataphatic approach may be an interesting experiment, but amounts to basically begging to make serious mistakes and commit to them. The least one can say is that it is dangerous.
     
  13. dmap

    dmap God is good and beautiful

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2018
    Messages:
    1,002
    Ratings:
    +299
    Religion:
    deist monotheist agnostic panentheist
    I think God has at least the same attributes as humans and animals: soul, consciousness, self, free will. But most about God is unknowable.
     
  14. Vinayaka

    Vinayaka devotee
    Premium Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    27,095
    Ratings:
    +11,472
    Religion:
    Saivite Hindu
    In my faith it's both. In my experience, it's cataphatic.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Sunstone

    Sunstone De Diablo Del Fora
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    70,186
    Ratings:
    +27,938
    Religion:
    Erotic Dancing Girls
    In the end, apophatic. To me, all attributes assigned to god as a result of mystical experiences are after-the-fact interpretations of mystical experiences -- and not pure descriptions of deity.

    The actual mystical experience -- so far as I can see -- is beyond human understanding. It is only in the aftermath of it that we begin to ascribe attributes to what we have experienced. The caveat is that we sometimes do that so soon after the experience that we become confused and think we are describing god as we experience god, rather than interpreting god just an instant or so after we have experienced god.

    We say to ourselves, "That's infinity!", rather than, "I have just now experienced what I interpret as having been an experience of infinity".

    At least, that's how I see it. I'm probably all wrong about that -- I'm wrong about most everything else.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  16. Jumi

    Jumi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2014
    Messages:
    9,881
    Ratings:
    +5,443
    Religion:
    Secular theist (none)
    That's right. And even we most likely feel the interpretations are a tad silly if we look at them. When I was reading a sidenote about mystics in grade school mandatory religion classes I thought it sounded foolish or purposely occultative, but later on when we experience things that can't be put into words we realize that in fact our vocabulary these days might not go much beyond our predecessors millenia ago. Perhaps we are even a bit more stuck to the basics of it.

    Then let us be wrong together. ;)
     
  17. SalixIncendium

    SalixIncendium Resident Hermit
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2016
    Messages:
    5,452
    Ratings:
    +5,710
    Religion:
    Advaitist Hindu
    My most profound experience, which was spontaneous, might have led me toward cataphatic tendencies, as it was a singular experience and I had nothing against which to compare it (I had actually written it off as an aberration for quite some time), but research in what I had experienced coupled with subsequent experiences has moved me into solidly the into the apophatic camp.
     
  18. dingdao

    dingdao The eternal Tao cannot be told - Tao Te Ching

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2019
    Messages:
    273
    Ratings:
    +121
    Religion:
    Nominally Taoist
    I'm in between.
    To go metaphorical, and somewhat pantheistic, I can describe the part of the universe I live in.
    We can try to talk about God by label: the God referenced in God's Kingdom, The Wall that Talks, The Being of Light, The Atman, or referenced by different books. Or we can try by experience: NDE, Samahdi, Enlightenment, or summoned.
    I think the second option provides more of a common basis of discussion.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. Jumi

    Jumi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2014
    Messages:
    9,881
    Ratings:
    +5,443
    Religion:
    Secular theist (none)
    God's Kingdom, Baptism, stepping in the river all seem more like a poetic description of the experiences, metaphors for use that have taken on a different life.
     
  20. dingdao

    dingdao The eternal Tao cannot be told - Tao Te Ching

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2019
    Messages:
    273
    Ratings:
    +121
    Religion:
    Nominally Taoist
    Granted, God's Kingdom is conceptual, but it provides a basis for explaining this drunken play.
    Terminally ill patients frequently talk of wanting to go home. Including those in hospice at home.
     
Loading...