I would be considered a leftist (possibly leaning towards individual anarchism?) but I would reject the left in America and support the right simply because I see the right as open to dialogue whereas the left is not, and shutting down dialogue, such as shouting down people in universities rather than reasoning with them is a slap in the face of critical thinking. So I consider the indoctrinated left dangerous and way too influential when it comes to the popular opinion.
Interesting, I'm a Non-American too (all the America-centered politics on the internet is like a strange alternate reality that is very separate from daily life and the politics where I am).
I'm very much a left-leaning person myself. I've flirted with and had my moments as a right-winger but I find it less and less justifiable the more spiritual I get and the more I engage both political and philosophical thought (though philosophy is something I have already read as much as religious texts).
I'm definitely not a liberal by any stretch of the imagination, I do have anarchist tendencies though, occasionally Socialist and Marxist flirtation (particular around certain dialectics and critiques given by certain important thinkers from those camps, moreso than mainline application which misses the mark entirely).
Ultimately though I am very much about both individual liberty
(which I think all religions teach, although Christianity can be pretty oppressive particularly those that take Paul and the Apocalypse of st John too seriously) and for ecological focus.
I see both as fundamental concerns that stand both above technological advancement and any post-Global concerns that the 'leading' countries of the world focus on in their agendas.
Without individual liberty and care about nature, we're basically tightening our own noose and saying goodbye to humanity. Most civilizations pre-modern understood the reality of this, yet modern left wingers and right wingers both have a strong tendency to be apathetic towards these fundamentals.