Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One with God, or God-man etc.Define "Enlightened".
Ok, than what's your answer, on your better suggested question ? GeorgeSure: nothing would preclude an enlightened individual from being present so it is possible. The better question might be what would an enlightened person do on RF?
One with God, or God-man etc.
Ok, than what do you understand people like Jesus, Buddha etc.. ?Not by that definition.
Enlightment as I understand it, however, is in fact a common if fleeting occurrence. Statistically, we can't help but have had a few often-enlightened posters and quite a few enlightened posts.
The trick is in being wise - in effect, enlightened - to tell which ones are and in making good use of such (an often neglected yet crucial care to take). Enlightened people are useless if there is no resonance.
But am talking about.. Enlightened, rather Inlightened one.I don't see any reason why an "inlightened" person would have for staying away from a religious forum. Unless he/she just wants to spend more time in his inlightenment practices, because to become inlightened one would have to practice and the practice takes time, and that means time away from the forum. But, being on the forum itself i can't find no reason why that would be bad to an inlightened person. If anything it would be good, they could share their thoughts and experience and knowledge. That would help others, something an inlightened person would want to do anyhow.
Ok, than what do you understand people like Jesus, Buddha etc.. ?
Ah! I think if i'll carry on the discussion it will again end on saying "I don't believe that God exist"I'm not sure that Jesus and even Buddha existed as such.
In any case, they would be simply people with a particularly stable religious wisdom. Their main goal was to show the way, inspiring and helping others in raising and keeping their own enlightment.
...and to not be here with us, even though we think things would be better if they were still around. Their absence is their final lesson.LuisDantes said:I'm not sure that Jesus and even Buddha existed as such.
In any case, they would be simply people with a particularly stable religious wisdom. Their main goal was to show the way, inspiring and helping others in raising and keeping their own enlightment.
Ah! I think if i'll carry on the discussion it will again end on saying "I don't believe that God exist"
Well, I think its my fault that I should have written in the OP that this thread is only for the people who believe in the existence of God, and consider these enlightened people as equal to God.
Anyways, its really tough job to have debate with you, Luis.
But not impossible, is it ?If that is what you wanted, maybe you should. Although I must insist in that such is an unusual demand for a concept of enlightment.
But not impossible, is it ?
"Well-enlightened"No, of course it is not impossible for a well-enlightened person to be a theist.
"Well-enlightened"
Wow! the very new word I got today
BTW, what is the difference between Enlightened and Well-Enlightened ? luis
Mind or patience ?It is shorthand for someone who is wise and consistently enlightened and does not lose his mind easily, if at all.
Everyone is enlightened at least a few brief moments at a time.
You, betcha, hon. Though, to be honest, I tend to shy away from the term nowadays due to peoples warped views of what Enlightenment is.Is it possible, Enlightened person to be present here on this forum between us ? why, or why not ?
The real question is if such an individual would match your expectations or not. I'm thinking that in 99.9999% of cases said person would not match human animal's expectations. It's not like your average human animal is an expert judge of such matter, lol.One with God, or God-man etc.
Is it possible, Enlightened person to be present here on this forum between us ? why, or why not ?