Gandhi used the word "Truth" as sometimes a substitute for "God" as he firmly believed that Truth was not relative to what we might believe.
Science tries to deal with Truth, and this Truth clearly is the case with what we know about evolution since the evidence for it is both massive and logical. In order for any religious approach to be Truth, it must agree with what's thus far been found to be the Truth. If you believe that the creation accounts must be taken as literal, then you simply do not know the Truth-- you only think you do.
What you miss is that in the traditional Jewish writing style, we use allegory, metaphors, various forms of symbolism, parables, and any other words for our sometimes symbolic approach when communicating. What you are doing is proclaiming that these accounts must be taken literally, which is clearly nonsense because we find these symbolic approaches being used through the scriptures, including the Christian ones. Even read Revelations? Ever read any of Jesus' parables?
What you are doing is reading these accounts through "modern western eyes", but the scriptures were written through "traditional Asian (Semitic) eyes". As long as you insist on using this modern-western approach, your understanding of scripture is going to be quite limited and often mistaken.
