You're young.My perspective is that it is older than me, and I know this because it was here when I arrived.
When I arrived, it still had that new car smell.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You're young.My perspective is that it is older than me, and I know this because it was here when I arrived.
You're young.
When I arrived, it still had that new car smell.
For something arrived at so indirectly, & requiring so much technology,
it's impressive that both estimates are of the same order of magnitude.
For you.....But I'm old for a bear...besides I think it hung up one of those little tree car fresheners from its rear view mirror by the time I arrived
Even 23 bil is in the same range as 5 & 14.I'm not impressed at all. Next week they might go back to 5 billion or boost it up to 23 billion. Who knows? It just shows how much you wish to depend upon a wild guess that is based on speculation.
You don't have to speak solely from your religious views alone.
Various religions, philosophies and ideas give different timelines and theories about creation and it's future.
But do you take the timeline and theories given by your religion literally or figuratively?
Buddhism and Taoism deals less with creation and cosmic drama but focuses more on humanistic ethics and morals and is expected to evolve with time and new evidence based on research.
Hinduism gives different timelines. Some say the universe is 8.64 billion years old while Vedic calculations puts it at 155.05 trillion years back.
Science says the universe is around 14 billion years old.
What's your perspective?
I'm not impressed at all. Next week they might go back to 5 billion or boost it up to 23 billion. Who knows? It just shows how much you wish to depend upon a wild guess that is based on speculation.
Even 23 bil is in the same range as 5 & 14.
Contrast this with biblically based estimates of 6K to 10K years.
Boy, oh boy.....it must be embarrassing to try to defend those claims.
No, it is 13.8 billions years old. And if they claim otherwise in the future, I am going to write a holy book that fixes the age once and for all.
Problem solved.
Ciao
- viole
I don't worry about the past. It's done and gone. Today and tomorrow are what count.
This is why I used the carefully worded "bibically based" to refer to those who reason from Bible based premises.Not at all. Anyway, those claims are based on the generations from Adam to Jesus found in Matthew and the OT. The Bible never comes out and says "the earth is 6-10,000 years old." I'm afraid that is an assumption as well.
About 20 years ago they said it was only 5 billion years old. That's not bad. According to them they had only missed it by 8 billion years!
This thread is about personal ideas or theories.
What you've stated sounds like you're dodging it. Your religious views might have an opinion on it.
Then, in 4 billion years, things will be chaotic when our galaxy collides with Andromeda. Not sure how that will go.
That's the difference between science and Catholic apologetics.
One evolves with new evidence while the other dodges the question entirely.
Well, unless you are as well read as Einstein or Newton no one will care what you write. Problem still there.
We actually do know. It will certainly be a chaotic sky, but the stars are so far apart that they most likely won't ever meet.
Nope. I will claim divine inspiration.
Woukd you then believe me?
Ciao
- viole
Not at all. Anyway, those claims are based on the generations from Adam to Jesus found in Matthew and the OT. The Bible never comes out and says "the earth is 6-10,000 years old." I'm afraid that is an assumption as well.
The life of Brahma, per various Hindu scriptures is much longer than the age of the universe. It's reasonable to assume that the universe is created and ends many times during Brahma's life.I don't use scriptures as science books... It's just the possibility I hold and will believe if proven.
Christian claim of 6000 years is proven false..
I don't know about the Islamic ones.
But since the Hindu version of 8.64 billion too is prove false, I'll stick too 14 billion years too but also keep an open mind about 155.05 trillion years.