That's called parandroid.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How Long Before Science Creates Life?
- Thread starter Sunstone
- Start date
That's called parandroid.
I call him Marvin.
The pro-evolution always admit that and said that.
I never agree with that, I just cut/paste what they saying.
What does he call you?
If they said that, they are under a deep misunderstanding. Anyone who says that shows they haven't really looked into what evolution is about.
I understand you're just going on what you think some people have said, but that doesn't mean you know what you're talking about. To understand this subject you will need to actually study it, to go and read up on it, understand the basic processes involved and how more complex phenomena emerge from them, etc. I'm sorry, but there's no quick and easy way here.
No, we do not.
Only someone who failed to grasp the basics of evolution would say such a thing.
Natural selection is by definition NOT random.
Without understanding the basics of it, unfortunately.
"Liebchen"
Actually you did, I find some of your old replies.
give me permission to post them ?
ScottySatan
Well-Known Member
I'd say we can make a bacterium from scratch in 10 years if we get the funding. This will cost billions and the money's not forthcoming right now.
"On the order of complexity of a bacterium", it's impossible to say, they are still the subject of study. We don't know everything about them yet.
"On the order of complexity of a bacterium", it's impossible to say, they are still the subject of study. We don't know everything about them yet.
Guy Threepwood
Mighty Pirate
So we have proven life can be created by intelligent design? That's interesting.
How about it accidentally creating itself- any luck there yet?
Correction. We have shown that super-physical processes are not necessary to create life. Certain chemicals with certain properties will create life through ordinary laws of physics and chemistry when suitable conditions occur. Now its a case of
1) Determining how these chemicals can arise under natural conditions
2) How the suitable conditions under which these chemicals create life through the laws of chemistry and physics arose in the ancient earth.
Excellent progress has been made in addressing both these questions.
Here is an example of the progress made in understanding how these chemicals were synthesized naturally on early earth.
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/42472/title/On-the-Origins-of-Life/
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/rna-world-inches-closer-explaining-origins-life
Guy Threepwood
Mighty Pirate
Okay, so we haven't created life, we cannot actually observe, measure, life being created under any circumstances- with our without our help.
So anything beyond is still speculation. What we have established, is that life isn't the sort of thing that that spontaneously organizes itself out of any old bucket of ingredients- given enough time and space. It requires a composition that is extremely specific to determining that end result.
Sure. I well remember how often we pointed out - to no avail, apparently - that mutations are random, but natural selection and therefore evolution are not.Actually you did, I find some of your old replies.
give me permission to post them ?
I thought this was interesting. So how long before she becomes self aware, and with the emotions that are being programmed into her, starts informing men that they are wrong? She already has the disapproving stare down that all us married guys are all too familiar with.
Ah,so you try to say,that mutations had nothing to do with evolution?
McBell
mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
I refuse to coddle your willful ignorance.
Is this coincidence!! . we exchange "the refuse"
I refuse your personal rude speech,and arrogance.