Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You mention 'full potential' but who's potential is being realized? The potential of women? Or rather is it an arbitrary expectation placed upon women? Putting the cart before the horse will surely lead to discord and trouble (and it has).
You can never have gender equality. The term 'equality' is a poor term. We're not all born equal. Anyone who thinks that is blind, and needs to look around just a little.
What we can have is respect for each and every human, regardless of gender, race, religion. ethnicity, etc. 'Equality' is another vague term like 'unity' that sounds nice, but is essentially meaningless in reality.
Men and women should have equal status, neither should seek to lord it over the other.
That is the key. With God there is no gender. We are one in spirit. The equality is in the right to pursue our highest aspirations, to our full potential.
Exactly. But apparently women do not have full potential to be members of UHJ.
But each person is different. Those differences are what makes this planet so amazing. Not the sameness, but the differences. If we were all the same, life would be so boring.
A unity and equality in our diversity.
Each having opportunity to reach their highest potential.
The view we hold as to what is the highest potential, will vary. I see it is to know and love God, that all knowledge has that aim.
Too had the potential that someone can reach is judged by others rather than their own qualifications. Such is the transition out of archaic primitive societies. But there are many unfair limitations besides dogmatic religious hierarchy, and wealth being the main one I'm guessing. How many gifted scientists fall through the cracks due to being born into poverty?
I see we are living in a time of change and great change is happening.
The unity of humanity, in its diversity, is a goal we have to implement to ensure a future for our children. For this to happen will require a mindset open to the oneness of humanity.
I see world events indicate this change needs to happen sooner than later. I wish you safe and well in these times.
Regards Tony
Tony, I'm not concerned one iota. This ego/personality will soon be dust. But you go ahead.
That is the key. With God there is no gender. We are one in spirit. The equality is in the right to pursue our highest aspirations, to our full potential.
Equality is not sameness. When you bring gender into the discussion it is obvious you can not have sameness.
Opportunity is given when those that prevent that opportunity, have a change of heart. That requires education. Thus the first step is to give access to all people of all races and gender, the right to a quality education, an education founded on virtues and free of all predudices.
Regards Tony
We may be splitting hairs here. If we unpack 'opportunity' what does that really mean to you?
Are you referring instead to social mobility? Or are you referring to educational indoctrination?
Are you saying people have the right to pursue happiness? Or the right to be served a chunk of happiness?
Opportunity is just that. To pursue ones choices.
Education has to be decided upon, it does not just happen.
Thus the role of a loving parent is to provide that opportuinty for a child by providing the best education they can in a suitable environment, so a child can find their potential.
The role of scociety is to determine what is the best education we can have to acheive this and implement it.
From a Baha'i point of view it has been found that for a child to find their greatest potential, the first level of education required is virtues. The foundation of virtues builds strong individuals and enables them to explore their potential without predudices and barriers.
Regards Tony
Is this distinction similar to the equality vs equity meme in circulation?Okay, I think we may agree on the importance of educating children, but what about the education of women specifically? Do you think that's a thing? Or do you think the education of all people is the same regardless of gender?
For example:
What if we were on a board and we were making a decision about whether or not to offer a women's scholarship for higher education? How would you decide if that was appropriate or not? Or would you simply say straight up that we should reject it because it is obviously not equal opportunity (men are excluded from the scholarship)? How and on what basis should we make this sort of decision?
The principle of 'equal opportunity' suggests that a woman only scholarship is prejudiced and creates a barrier between men and women. Do you agree with that assessment of the principle of 'equal opportunity'? If not, why?
Is this distinction similar to the equality vs equity meme in circulation?
View attachment 26700
Is this distinction similar to the equality vs equity meme in circulation?
View attachment 26700