Ummmmm...... you're ranting, and off subject.
You can't win a debate about the verity of the gospels by using flat-earth belief.
That's the kind of thing that the mythers try. .
Cute. Name-calling, that's all you have? Above, you have several examples of Ugly Name calling.
As for flat earth belief? Considering the bible describes a Flat Earth? The irony of someone claiming the bible is ... "real" but complains about a Straw Man "flat earth"? Is laughable.
There were a few Statements about the Baptist, and about Jesus.
Start at the beginning. Disprove the Baptist and the mission first.
Good Luck with that..
No. There were no such things as you claim-- I note that this would have been an excellent example to make me look Silly, by providing a link to what is clearly a false claim...
You don't like that I call your posts like the ones written by the miffers, so don't wriote like that, is my suggestion..
And you don't want to be called on your UGLY attitude? Name-calling is all you have, apparently.... you can't provide one example that proves I'm wrong.
And G-Mark was probably written circa 55-65 AD, 30 years after the events..
Says who? You? I've seen claims that it was much older, around 90CE. But even 60 is way-way too long-- GENERATIONS too late.
You musdt remember that the Peasantry used Oral Tradition for recording their histories.
.
So what? Means exactly bupkiss-- WhatAboutIsm, really. Friend Of A Friend stories are never based in reality.
Your historical background doesn't seem strong on all this..
More name-calling. You just can't help yourself, but to go on PERSONAL ATTACK.
Classic Theism.
Paul was not a witness. .
Duuuuhhhhh.... but. 90% of modern Christianity is based on what the Heretic (Paul) wrote...
Ain't that ironic?
Mythers always concentrate on the weak writings..
WHERE ARE THE STRONG ONES? What's that? You do not HAVE any? Yes-- we know.
Try smashing up G-Mark. Yes Christians did fiddle with G-Mark, but the more you study so the more you see the fiddlings..
Mark was written way-- WAY too late to be of use, or to qualify as a source.
It's Friend of a Friend at **best**... gossip, really. Useless.
More name calling. Without even an attempt to refute.... Classic.
Now.......... try smashing up the beginning of it all. Try smashing up the Baptist story entirely.
.
Why? It's all a giant steaming pile of made up Myth.
We can move on to the Yeshua story later..
Who? Convenient Goal Post Shifting.
But doesn't matter-- YOU GOT NOTHING-- YOU LOSE. Again.
2
I love debating with the miffers, I'm just hoping that you might turn out to be one........ do you think it's all myth?
You must love being Ugly, and LOSING, then.