You said "there were no padres in Nazi regiments." Show me a regiment in Nazi Germany that didn't have any chaplains.Because Hitler was the crazed maniac under discussion.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You said "there were no padres in Nazi regiments." Show me a regiment in Nazi Germany that didn't have any chaplains.Because Hitler was the crazed maniac under discussion.
Substitute 'OK' for 'Right' or 'Now'. Where I live that's a way of trying to make new contact.......... it didn't work, I think. Never mind.You do realize that you said "OK" and then didn't do the thing you said you were going to do, right?
OKLet's try again:
Hey! If you want to push it, then let's go straight to the question of the thread's title.......Do you think that the person who wrote this "wanted to bring the people to Jesus, evangelising and teaching Christ's message?"
Oh dear...........You said "there were no padres in Nazi regiments." Show me a regiment in Nazi Germany that didn't have any chaplains.
I'm not answering your questions until you answer mine.Substitute 'OK' for 'Right' or 'Now'. Where I live that's a way of trying to make new contact.......... it didn't work, I think. Never mind.
OK
Hey! If you want to push it, then let's go straight to the question of the thread's title.......
The thread is about 'Do Atheists think that Hitler represents Christianity'.... !
Well, ......... do you?
Do you really think that Hitler had any intention of forming a Christian Third Reich? Do you think that Hitler wanted to bring all the people to Jesus?
What an idea!
IOW, you pulled the claim out of your butt and you don't want to admit it was nonsense.Oh dear...........
I'm not doing homework today for you.
The nonsense is all about Hitler being a Christian. Both by name and definition he never was.IOW, you pulled the claim out of your butt and you don't want to admit it was nonsense.
By the Catholic Church's definition, he most certainly was a Christian, regardless of his views and actions.The nonsense is all about Hitler being a Christian. Both by name and definition he never was.
I said that nazi regiments did not have chaplains.By the Catholic Church's definition, he most certainly was a Christian, regardless of his views and actions.
But his personal views are mostly irrelevant, since Nazi thought was heavily influenced by Christian beliefs, and the whole thing was designed to be adopted by a mostly-Christian German people.
Christianity has its fingerprints all over Naziism. Maybe your version of Christianity isn't compatible with Naziism, but Christianity is diverse; no one Christian's beliefs are compatible with the entire spectrum of Christianity.
Edit: but you're still not interested in backing up your ridiculous claim that the Nazis didn't have chaplains, eh?
I wouldn't lump all Trump supporters in to one basket, I know anm English Lady at swimming club who thinks that Trump could have been a Churchill for gathering the people together in a really dark-hour, and she is not religious at all.
But if you mean the horror of Right wing (so-called) Christian extremists, the kind that want to see public executions back for a whole string of OT offences, who want to see Mecca and Medina 'glassed', who believe in Nationalism ........ and worse, why, I don't think that Jesus drives their mindsets, rather that they hold up a cross to hide behind........
.
True......
Yes..... I have.
I know Christian groups (here) that are decent, peaceful, honest and trustworthy in all that they do, and nothing like the majority who call themselves by that name..
And Hitler was not any kind of Christian, imo..
Many of the SS regiments were penal .......... mixed bag of 'die on frontline or take a worse punishment' soldiers.
Do you think that these were the elite of Nazism?.
If you are trying to show that Jesus and his message/mission was the cause of Nazi wickedness then 'Good Luck' with that.
The gospels are not anonymous, it's just that three were written by 'non-witnesses'.
Three of them were written in the 1st century.
Do you really think that Hitler had any intention of forming a Christian Third Reich? Do you think that Hitler wanted to bring all the people to Jesus?
What an idea!
The nonsense is all about Hitler being a Christian. Both by name and definition he never was.
I hope you read the paras that I copied from wiki.
Rubbish........By the Catholic Church's definition, he most certainly was a Christian, regardless of his views and actions.
This thread is about Hitler, his beliefs.But his personal views are mostly irrelevant, since Nazi thought was heavily influenced by Christian beliefs, and the whole thing was designed to be adopted by a mostly-Christian German people.
I reckon that only evangelical atheists could push this idea.Christianity has its fingerprints all over Naziism. Maybe your version of Christianity isn't compatible with Naziism, but Christianity is diverse; no one Christian's beliefs are compatible with the entire spectrum of Christianity.
Now come on........Edit: but you're still not interested in backing up your ridiculous claim that the Nazis didn't have chaplains, eh?
How can you fit 'several generations' in to the 70 years of the 1st century after the Jesus mission ended?But several generations after the alleged "events".... ever play the game of "gossip" or "telephone"?
No way that any of these stories contain anything reality-based.
Maybe clarify what you're talking about. The entire Wehrmacht is normally referred to as the armed forces of Nazi Germany.I said that nazi regiments did not have chaplains.
You keep referring to regular troops
Except for all the Christianity.Now, did you read the piece that I copied for you? Clearly the Nazi doctrine was nothing to do with Christianity.
Martin Luther more than Christianity as a whole. Hitler basically put Luther's anti-Semitic vision - motivated by his faith - into practice.It seems as if you want to blame Christianity for the WW2. Yes?
If so, ridiculous
Finally: That young, strong Jews be given flail, ax, spade, spindle, and let them earn their bread in the sweat of their noses as imposed upon Adam 's children, Genesis 3:19 — "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." For it will not do that they should let us cursed Goyim work in the sweat of our brow, while they, the holy people, devour our bread in laziness behind the stove and then boast that they are masters over the Christians ; but their laziness should be driven from their back.
FYI: I'm not going to go along with this until you answer my question:Rubbish........
This thread is about Hitler, his beliefs.
I reckon that only evangelical atheists could push this idea.
Now come on........
Time for real history.
Please go to google and enter the link below rather than just click on it.
That just about ends this nonsensical claim that Hitler was a true Christian
- Was Adolf Hitler a Christian? -- TrueOrigin Archive
In Hitler’s words “the heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity” (Hitler, 1953, p. 6). The Jesuits were “swine,” and all of Christianity was “Jewish Christianity” which was comparable with “Jewish Bolshevism.” Hitler concluded that both were evil and both had to be destroyed (Kershaw, 2000, pp. 330, 488). His reasoning was based on his belief that Christianity was an “illegitimate” Jewish child and, as a Jewish child, was swine like its parent that must be eradicated. Hitler considered Christianity the “invention of the Jew Saul” (Azar, 1990, p. 154).
A major reason Hitler opposed Christianity was because Hitler saw Christianity and Science as diametrically opposed to each other (Azar, 1990, p. 154). He concluded science would win, and the Christian church would eventually in due time be destroyed. Hitler even believed science was the creation of the German race. Hitler was trying to use science — especially Darwinism — to create a utopia on Earth, and he made it absolutely clear that there would be “no place in this utopia for the Christian Churches” in his plans for the future of Germany.
Finally: That young, strong Jews be given flail, ax, spade, spindle, and let them earn their bread in the sweat of their noses as imposed upon Adam 's children, Genesis 3:19 — "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." For it will not do that they should let us cursed Goyim work in the sweat of our brow, while they, the holy people, devour our bread in laziness behind the stove and then boast that they are masters over the Christians ; but their laziness should be driven from their back.
Which part of history directly contradicts the story of Yeshua and the Baptiste? Even critics of Christianity accepted that Jesus was real.So YOU say. History tells a very different tale-- one that directly contradicts your claims.
I'm just telling you about what I found over many years of study. And since I'm not a Christian you can't scream 'agenda!' at me.Here's an idea: Let's not rely on YOUR unreliable and un-referenced claims. Who made you an authority anyway?
Yeshua died in the 1st century, so that's odd, especuially coming from an unbeliever...... are you a myther, by the way?Let's get Jesus to come down and sort it all out, shall we?
No.... afraid not.What? Jesus won't do that?
Ha ha! Well, you're writing like mythers write, which made your sentence very ironic!yeah... that's how Mythic Beings operate, isn't it?
M
BTW: I hope you don't think I've forgotten that you still haven't answered my question:
Do you think that the person who wrote this "wanted to bring the people to Jesus, evangelising and teaching Christ's message?"
I have answered your question ...... more than once.FYI: I'm not going to go along with this until you answer my question:
Do you think that the person who wrote this "wanted to bring the people to Jesus, evangelising and teaching Christ's message?"
Thank you.Certainly not.
This was a political rant, intended to influence...... Christian voters!
Look, you have now seen what the true intention was, to subdue any kiond of religions which did not fit with and bolster Hitler's Reich-Plan.