Yes, I need the translation to English also.
Sai Baba is talking here about "Prema
" (03:38 He uses Prema) the Sanskrit word
By Prema or Love
is meant Love which is unsullied, unselfish, devoid of impurity and continuous
(click this link: Prema Vahini
Your question was "is God all loving
Above definition of Prema (Love) clearly states that Love is only Prema IF it is continuous
, hence "all Loving" is indeed an attribute of God
Here is a link to "Prema Vahini", the book written by Sai Baba about Prema (Love)
Unsullied. No association as thought is using other references against it.
Unselfish. Same terms.
Impurity no meaning whatsoever.
Love you can't sully.
Love was never being selfish yet a selfish human still loves.
Purity is not love as you cannot define it. As there is no clause.
A pure substance is natural.
Term a human thinks.
Type of chemical brain condition defines if senses sensing are balanced.
A balanced human has natural interactive human relationships. Without defining I'm more loving. Self definition. If you feel loving it causes mutual and then a higher considerate human response.
As the other human is instantly identified by behaviour mannerisms if they too are loving or not. And it doesn't make them less than you.
So you simply don't self deitise.
Instead if you are choosing to assist a human and it's kind ness. As it's needed.
To love is natural. It's humans who don't love that claim loving humans special. Instead of seeing they have been hurt themselves.
When I was hurt I wasn't loving as I endured change and inherited an inability to support my owned feelings.
Only a non loving human would attack experiment on a human brain and accuse it of being evil. Sick humans can't defend their bio Inheritance.
Scientists saw sick hurt human body brains not loving and were already advised.
They wanted to copy the idea of against love themselves with machines used....when their identification a machines conditions already owned the terms.
Machine scientist looking for love as they claim love is God a power for a resource. Total intention to destroy our human ability to be loving as it's not a resource as God isn't love.
Theism. Be exact in your human used expressions as human scientists are willing to destroy human life.
Don't just argue for a belief.
God was a scientific human term for the purest highest substances above and below. That kept life safe. Humans love.
The creator that had released origin into its destruction then evolution is loving. A memory. What it caused was destruction...was never loving.
If a human can't think in definitive historic terms then don't theorise.