Are you now suggesting that instinct, evolution, taught man how to hunt and build pyramids since they had no science?!?
Don’t be absurd.
I have said nothing of the kind.
You still not getting what I am saying. It would seem you read my posts, but the messages are not reaching your brain.
Clearly you lack education in both science and history.
First, there is no “Ancient Science” as you call it, existing before 2000 BCE, from your imaginary “Tower of Babel”, as I keep telling you.
What we call science, was actually developed from philosophies, more specifically
natural philosophy.
Natural philosophy is the study of nature. Natural philosophy have earlier history.
Natural philosophy began with the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians, but still hindered by religious beliefs and superstitions, not direct inquiry.
But natural philosophy didn’t developed into a more direct inquiry into the cause and effect of nature until the late 7th century BCE, and onwards. They began studying nature, without resorting to superstitions. They study nature through observation. Natural philosophy include astronomy, science and mathematics, as well as basic biology and medicine.
But not all Greek philosophies were natural philosophy. There were all sorts of other philosophies, which pertained to lifestyles, on morals and ethic, and some philosophies had to do with religions.
When Rome fell in 476 CE, Western Europe, lost many works on Greek philosophies, but it continued to exist in Eastern Europe, through the Byzantine empire.
When the Arabs conquered territories of the Persian and Byzantine empires, like Egypt, Syria and Turkey, they acquired many Greek literature, including philosophies (as well as natural philosophy). Persian and Arab philosophers began translating and using Greek natural philosophies, and managed to improved upon it and even made some discoveries. And this eventually reached the Moorish rulers of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal), so natural philosophy (astronomy, science and mathematics) reappeared in Western Europe.
Slowly, but gradually, natural philosophy returned to Western Europe during the (High and Late) Middle Ages, eventually eclipsing Islamic natural philosophers, during the Italian Renaissance.
Natural philosophy continued to develop through the baroque and rococo periods, and at some points (I don’t have exact dates on this), natural philosophy eventually turned into multiple branches of
natural science.
Natural science is a direct inquiry to the study of nature, using Scientific Method, so natural science can also be called “empirical science” or “experimental science”. Natural science is divided today into physics, chemistry, biology, Earth science and astronomy, and each of these have divided into different fields.
Natural science is different from other sciences, like
(A) formal science is mathematics and logic,
(B) social science is divided into politics, economics, psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc.
Third. Hunting developed from the needs to survive, which for the humans (Homo sapiens), began around 200,000 years ago, in the middle of Middle Paleolithic period, where they developed stone and flint tools for day-to-day use and for hunting. Humans in the Paleolithic period were nomadic people, and acquired food from hunting and gathering.
Around 11 or 10 thousand years ago, the Ice Ages (or the last glacial period) ended, with Neolithic people resorting to farming and animal husbandry, as the mean of acquiring food sources, which mean they built homes as more permanent settlements, eventually developing into villages than towns. From 6000 or 5000 BCE, they developed pottery, which made it easier to store food.
All of this, the hunting, fishing, farming, building shelters, making tools and pottery, have absolutely nothing to do with evolution, and nothing to do with science. The knowledge are learned an past on from generation to generation, sometimes there are improvement (hence progress), but sometimes there are no improvement at all. But these early skills had nothing to do with direct inquiry to acquire knowledge, like the methodology of science. They are just technological progress.
And lastly, these skills are acquired, learned, not instinct.
You do understand the concept of progress of technology, don't you? Because you fail dismally in biology and history.