False. Egypt was post flood! God and His people and history were around a long time before this.
Yes there were other cultures but Yahweh did not exist until 9BC:
From the 9th into the 6th centuries BCE the Yahwistic religion separated itself from its
Canaanite heritage as Yahweh became the main god of the
Kingdom of Israel (Samaria) and of
Judah.
Far before Genesis were much earlier flood stories, one - Epic of Gilamesh is almost the exct Noah story. This is where the Israelites took the myth from:
For well over a century scholars have recognised that the Bible's story of Noah's ark is based on older Mesopotamian models.
[11] Because all these flood stories deal with events that allegedly happened at the dawn of history, they give the impression that the myths themselves must come from very primitive origins, but the myth of the global flood that destroys all life only begins to appear in the
Old Babylonian period (20th–16th centuries BCE).
[12] The reasons for this emergence of the typical Mesopotamian flood myth may have been bound up with the specific circumstances of the end of the
Third Dynasty of Ur around 2004 BCE and the restoration of order by the First Dynasty of
Isin.
[13]
There are nine known versions of the Mesopotamian flood story, each more or less adapted from an earlier version. In the oldest version, inscribed in the Sumerian city of
Nippur c.1600 BCE, the hero is King
Ziusudra. This is known as the Sumerian Flood Story and probably derives from an earlier version. The Ziusudra version tells how he builds a boat and rescues life when the gods decide to destroy it. This remains the basic plot for several subsequent flood-stories and heroes, including Noah. Ziusudra's Sumerian name means "He of long life". In Babylonian versions his name is
Atrahasis, but the meaning is the same. In the Atrahasis version, the flood is a river flood.
[14]:20–27
The version closest to the biblical story of Noah, as well as its most likely source, is that of
Utnapishtim in the
Epic of Gilgamesh
Noah's Ark - Wikipedia
This is how historians put the events. Now, as well as science denying I imagine you will go into some history denial as well. Fine with me, take the loss. I smashed your science now I''' smash your history.
Then the consensus for believers is that the foolish phony ignorant so called scholars do not know God or history or truth. So?
Well they don't know your pretend mythical version in your mind no? But in the real world smart people know stuff about history. And historical records show Yahweh was a minor storm god who lived on a tent on a hill. El was the chief Canaanite god while Yahweh lived on a hill"
El, "the kind, the compassionate", "the creator of creatures", was the chief of the Canaanite gods,
[38] and he, not Yahweh, was the original "God of Israel"—the word "Israel" is based on the name El rather than Yahweh.
[39] He lived in a tent on a mountain from whose base originated all the fresh waters of the world, with the goddess
Asherah as his consort.
[38][40]"
Keep that knowledge out of your folks basement! Don't let it in!
When talking about black holes and stars we usually think of big. However you would need to be clear.
Is this what it's like when you try to be clever? I'm embarrassed.
Strange fantasies. Of course you have no proof.
How do you think that helps you?
You see light here. Nowhere else. Ever. Period. We see it in our space and our time here. That tells us nothing about deep space time.
Prove it exists outside the area of the solar system?
Relativity is relative to the fishbowl. Minkie did not even know what time was!
There you go with that silly laws canard again. It gets old fast. The issue, once again, for deep space is not laws.
That means very little when we see it at unknown distances working on objects of unknown size. How could you do the math??[
First we would need to know distances and sizes. You don't. Then we might ask some other questions like could anything change of affect gravity, or are there any other forces we do not know about that could mimic it or be confused with it etc etc etc. Science is not even in kindergarten on these matters!
all of those responses assumes a idea you haven't proven, given evidence, given one single source and is a fantasy you want to be true for some reason.
However you have failed to show it's a reasonable possibility and have lost all lines of debate pertaining to it.
I'm not answering to your trolling "turtles" crap any longer. I can only win once, now it's just repeating the same stupid point over and over?
You have never seen a galaxy form. You think it takes millions of years. You have been looking what, a hundred years or a few hundred? Ha.
We can see it's evolution. They follow the laws of physics just fine.
That means all the stuff after it would be wrong also.
Big bang cosmology doesn't require inflation.
.
Ideas must be properly applied where they are applicable. You do not get to apply them willy nilly and project into all the universe.
And seeing electromagnetism and using it to make assumptions is a proper application. Until an alternative arrives.
Do you actually think all scientists working on outer space should now just say "hey let's no longer assume the light we are looking at is actually carrying correct information. Let's just assume that for no reason even though it appears like it is carrying correct information and it fits the idea that the laws are universal, even though it does that, and even though are calculations about gravity waves DID come true and even though the CMB experiments DID work out and countless other breakthroughs, let's just drop it all.
Let's all just go back to out parents basement and wait until Yahweh casts a spell of illumination. We can troll other scientists online and when they ask for evidence we will just ignore their requests and keep saying the same stuff over and over.
Says you. History and millions of people would disagree.
Demons are myths. Millions of people saw Sai Baba levitate and surgically heal people in India in the early 1900's. Yes, they were all fooled. People believe all sorts of nonsense, by the millions.
Millions of people believe in an alien crash at Roswell. Millions of people think mediums talk to their dead grandmothers. Millions of people think psychics are real yet not one physic ever predicted a global pandemic from China in 2020, the race riots or any other specific event. Not one even saw the internet was coming.
The devil entered Judaism after the Persian invasion.
"Zoroaster was thus the first to teach the doctrines of an individual judgment, Heaven and Hell, the future resurrection of the body, the general Last Judgment, and life everlasting for the reunited soul and body. These doctrines were to become familiar articles of faith to much of mankind, through borrowings by Judaism, Christianity and Islam"
Congratulations still believing in Persian myths.
False. You do not even know distances or sizes of any star. That is not science, but sorcery misnamed!
Yes we know the drill, light coming in from deep space has been altered by alternate forces of nature. Or is it alternate forces from demons? So it can't be trusted. Says the crazy dude in his folks basement with zero evidence.
The only remaining mystery is why would you want to continue debating something you have been getting completely spanked on? You make a statement and you give evidence. If it's a conspiracy theory then you give even better evidence. You think the laws of physics "must" be different but they conspire in such a way as to make it "seem" like they are consistent across the universe.
You failed to give any type of evidence for this wack-a-doodle non-science, religious dogma in the first post and just seem to want to continue to get beat up. When I ask for evidence and you do a run-around, give no evidence but keep stating the same thing, as if your point stands, but it doesn't.
You haven't even elevated it out of - guy on a street corner with cardboard sign "The world Will End Tomorrow" status yet? That's you getting whooped. Over and over and over....
