dad
Undefeated
Most things are upsetting to some people . So? I see no questions raised in your quote. Only glib doubts.Nope archeology does not support the OT.
Archeology of the Hebrew Bible
"William Dever, Professor Emeritus at the University of Arizona, -
From the beginnings of what we call biblical archeology, perhaps 150 years ago, scholars, mostly western scholars, have attempted to use archeological data to prove the Bible. And for a long time it was thought to work. [William Foxwell] Albright, the great father of our discipline, often spoke of the "archeological revolution." Well, the revolution has come but not in the way that Albright thought. The truth of the matter today is that archeology raises more questions about the historicity of the Hebrew Bible and even the New Testament than it provides answers, and that's very disturbing to some people
What were they looking for? His tomb is in Israel! Ha. Three religions accept Abraham as real!One of the first efforts of biblical archeology in the last century was to prove the historicity of the patriarchs, to locate them in a particular period in the archeological history. Today I think most archeologists would argue that there is no direct archeological proof that Abraham, for instance, ever lived.
Hey, we all see stuff out there. You just explain what we see with your religion.We do not just see bent light, we see black holes and all sorts of astronomical events that gravity makes predictions about and those predictions are accurate. Our best evidence shows it's the same laws of physics we have here.
Nonsense. The little dense hot soup thingie was a lot more squeezed in than a turtles insides! Of course science invents stuff.Exactly, you could say a turtle did that! And that's exactly what you are doing! HA HA But science doesn't do that, it creates models and predictions and goes with whatever provides the best evidence.
You beliefs are not evidence. Get over it.Yes except these "fables" have evidence. When evidence supports something else then science will explore that evidence.
So you have no clue either way and admit it may be wrong, but claim it has evidence so it's cool. Seriously?I don't "believe" in inflation. It's a model that has some reasons to think it's true and some to think it's wrong. That's what science does, it investigates and looks for new evidence, models, ideas and such.
Inflation might be completely wrong. But unlike turtles and your idea it has evidence.
False. The term fishbowl refers to the solar system and area. We have actual evidence that exists and that man has not been more than a light day away via probes."Fishbowl" = turtles. Provide evidence.
No one asked you to explain radioactive decay. You made a claim that gave distances to stars. You were asked to explain how.You are being disingenuous and dishonest in this request. You know you could Wiki Radiometric dating yourself.
Observed on earth 140 years ago.It says right in the article "Remains of 140-Year-Old Supernova Discovered"
I see. So now you need to prive distance out to 25,000 ly! Good luck with that.You then said - "So they say the distance is 25,000 ly away. Then they say we saw the light 140 years ago. Ha." You said "HA" because if the supernova was 140 years old and 25000 light years away that cannot make sense. So you said "HA". Because that cannot make sense.
But..................at the end of the article they corrected the mistake and said the supernova was over 25000 years old. Is it really this hard to admit you made a mistake? This actually explains a lot.
Who says spacetime exists beyond the fishbowl? Time of some sort likely exists and space of some sort also. We do not know that space and time are woven together as they are here in the fishbowl though, out in deep space.RIght and why would the nature of spacetime that we have locally be different beyond the solar system?
Being observed here in our time we would experience and see it all in our time here. That does not mean that the same time is involved out there!Especially when we can see that everything is operating the same
Well, I could argue for some variation of that, however that is another topic for another thread! In this thread the issue is what time is like out there, and space. (not laws). OH wait, I KNOW, I KNOW!!!!....because the light coming to us is actually coming from a completely different set of physical laws ...AND the light just happens to fool us and make it look like the laws are the same!!
DO I have evidence? No of course not, this idea is the same as turtles. So am I just saying that it's a possibility? NO!!!!!! I KNOW EVERYTHING.
Losing it eh?
Maybe God has a recycle system of death and new birth in the universe as He does on earth? Who knows what black holes really are, and what they really do? Since science does not know sizes or distances though, what they claim is 1000 times a big as the sun might be the size of a football field for all we actually know. The implications are staggering.Maybe a new force will be discovered that could produce a black hole, who knows what science will discover?
They visualize it that way. That doesn't really mean much. They do not know what time is! They do not know what space is! Time and space as we know it in the fishbowl may be 'spacetime'. All that means is fishbowl time and space! Tat has no application for the universe at large.In modern physics time is 1 dimension of spacetime.
Yes, fishbowl space and time are known to work a certain way. Thus far, and no further, you shall not pass!It slows from acceleration and gravity and these effects have been demonstrated. So time follows the laws of physics.