Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's it. That's what I was trying to say.I'm actually watching some of this out of morbid curiosity, and to try to understand Ken Ham's way of thinking. It's fascinating and telling how he says to Nye what he is saying is a "different worldview". It's not a different worldview, its a different mode of thinking, a different epistemological approach. That's not a worldview or a philosophy. I can share Nye's mode of thinking and have an entirely different worldview.
Ham is completely outclassed by Nye. He can't think in rational modes. It's mythological storyline modes. He can't translate the world using the modes of thought that Nye does. He is not capable of that type of thought. That's all this boils down to. It's not an argument of facts, but an argument of modes of thinking.
Actually, trying to put myself into Ham's world of thinking for a moment, I will bet any money that he thinks that by just bringing Nye into his Bible Boat, that just the exposure to the word of God will work its magic on him. I've known Christians that think like this, and I'll bet that's his underlying thought, that he hopes it will lead to his conversion, that "God will convict his heart with his word," and so forth.This is even more ridiculous when you consider the fact that Ken Hamm must have agreed to this debate... What did he think was going to happen?
Bill Nye visited a Noah’s Ark he doesn’t believe should existActually, trying to put myself into Ham's world of thinking for a moment, I will bet any money that he thinks that by just bringing Nye into his Bible Boat, that just the exposure to the word of God will work its magic on him. I've known Christians that think like this, and I'll bet that's his underlying thought, that he hopes it will lead to his conversion, that "God will convict his heart with his word," and so forth.
The end justifies the means in their minds. Nothing wrong about lying for Jesus if it get's someone saved, they think. It's not evil when a Christian lies.Just from a personal level, as a former believer, it really bothers me how far apologetics has fallen and how underhanded the tactics to defend the faith must be.
As I understand it, Ken Ham was the person to initiate it. He publicly invited Bill Nye. So is this a publicity stunt? Probably for both, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Ken thinks he's got all the answers, and hopes to either convert Bill (he and at least one other person tried), or make a mockery of science to "all the young people" and prove their claim as true.This is even more ridiculous when you consider the fact that Ken Hamm must have agreed to this debate... What did he think was going to happen?