anna.
but mostly it's the same
. It’s called hypocrisy.
No it isn't because you're comparing two discrete events having two distinctly different motivations.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
. It’s called hypocrisy.
I view this ban as based on health concerns rather than racial discrimination.
Trump's travel ban on Muslim countries was a different story and had a clearly political and religious basis. This ban doesn't; I'd agree with a ban like this one even if Trump were the one to implement it.
No, the Biden administration is......check out our southern bordersWait...you're advocating for removal all border controls? Seems extreme.
The move is similar to the China travel ban that then-President Donald Trump instituted in early 2020. The reaction hasn’t been: “We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus,” Biden tweeted, the day after Trump announced the travel ban. “We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia and fear-mongering.”
Uh excuse me, the problem is not with the proposed ban on Muslims but the travel ban on China
From the second article linked
Are you 100% positive that this new variant hasn't already spread. It only takes 1 person to infect the entire world.The difference appears to be in the justifications behind it. Biden was fairly correct that travel bans targeting China would not stop it due to the spread was already occurring in Europe.
This appears to be targeting new variants, which hopefully have not spread.
Did you even read the second article:Apples and oranges. Trump banned Muslims because they were Muslim.
Statements made before and after the election by Donald Trump and his allies about his travel ban have been giving the administration headaches as it defends the executive order’s constitutionality.
The argument that the ban is purely secular has not fared well with judges when the Trump campaign website stated in advance that its purpose was “preventing Muslim immigration,” which has sounded to a number of courts like an unconstitutional religion-based restriction.
The move is similar to the China travel ban that then-President Donald Trump instituted in early 2020. The reaction hasn’t been: “We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus,” Biden tweeted, the day after Trump announced the travel ban. “We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia and fear-mongering.”
All it takes is 1 person to infect the entire world.I'm from Africa myself, and I agree with travel bans that are based on sound reasoning and expert advice whether they're implemented by Trump or Biden. A travel ban to limit the spread a new variant of a pandemic virus seems quite reasonable, and I don't imagine the ban is intended to be permanent either.
Looks like you didn't read the second linked article either:Trump's travel ban on Muslim countries was a different story and had a clearly political and religious basis. This ban doesn't; I'd agree with a ban like this one even if Trump were the one to implement it.
The move is similar to the China travel ban that then-President Donald Trump instituted in early 2020. The reaction hasn’t been: “We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus,” Biden tweeted, the day after Trump announced the travel ban. “We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia and fear-mongering.”
Ah, and another who didn't read the second article:Trump's original travel ban was against ALL Muslims but then he changed it after he was told it would undoubtedly be declared unconstitutional.
The move is similar to the China travel ban that then-President Donald Trump instituted in early 2020. The reaction hasn’t been: “We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus,” Biden tweeted, the day after Trump announced the travel ban. “We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia and fear-mongering.”
And again it only takes 1 person to infect the worldThe travel ban because of the new variant is not just being done here in the States but also some countries in the EU and probably will be replicated because of the potential dangers involved.
Thus, If Biden did nothing, we would then hear those with Biden Derangement Syndrome whining as many of them already are, including those who parroted their "Trump Derangement Syndrome" towards those of us who wouldn't support that traitor who tried to overthrow our election. Why would any freedom-loving person support Putin's BFF, after he tried to kill our democracy?
Did you even read the second article:
Wait, you know Biden isn’t banning southern Africans because they’re black?
Second article linked in OPNo. I depended on your OP to lay out the argument. You didn't reference the China travel ban.
No one called the travel ban racist. Lie.Second article linked in OP
VICTOR JOECKS: Travel bans, filibusters only racist when Republicans use them
The move is similar to the China travel ban that then-President Donald Trump instituted in early 2020. The reaction hasn’t been: “We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus,” Biden tweeted, the day after Trump announced the travel ban. “We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia and fear-mongering.”
Looks like you didn't read the second linked article either:
Second article linked in OP
VICTOR JOECKS: Travel bans, filibusters only racist when Republicans use them
The move is similar to the China travel ban that then-President Donald Trump instituted in early 2020. The reaction hasn’t been: “We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus,” Biden tweeted, the day after Trump announced the travel ban. “We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia and fear-mongering.”
Oh for the love of Pete...
The desperateness of some people to make Biden somehow, some way, as much of an embarrassment as Trump is so transparent.
No, Biden is not instituting a travel ban against South Africa because they're black. It's because of COVID. In distinction to Trump, who overtly said he was trying to ban all Muslims from entering the country.
If you don't see the painfully obvious difference there, I can't help you.
Starting Monday 29 Nov, 2021 a travel ban on people entering the US by air from South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Namibia, Lesotho, Eswatini, Mozambique and Malawi by air. Certain groups are exempt. Other counrties have also established this policy.
Biden restricts travel from South Africa and seven other countries starting Monday - CNNPolitics
Seems I remember Biden having a hissy fit over President Trumps travel ban.
Biden said the day after Trump announced the travel ban. “We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia and fear-mongering.”
VICTOR JOECKS: Travel bans, filibusters only racist when Republicans use them
Guess when your a politican when the other party does it's bad and when you do it, it's good.
Wonder what the lock-down political party is going to attempt to implement this winter?
Are you 100% positive that this new variant hasn't already spread. It only takes 1 person to infect the entire world.
Guess when your a politican when the other party does it's bad and when you do it, it's good.
So your argument is that travel bans are inherently ineffective, which is why both Trump and Biden were wrong to implement them. Correct?We now know that travel bans do not work.....
Anyone can enter this country at any time without a passport, visa, green card, or proof of vaccintaion....just walk across the border.
Fear mongering against whom, exactly?So, this is nothing more than fear mongering
That is what I saidSo your argument is that travel bans are inherently ineffective, which is why both Trump and Biden were wrong to implement them. Correct?
The American public.Fear mongering against whom, exactly?