Yes indeed. But I am struggling to see how a rehash of religious ideas that were, it seems, so incongruous to the reality of the general human way of thinking - even in their own time - that they could only become widely accepted at the point of a sword, is going to help us with that.
Don't get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for the ideas of some of the ancient sages, but their religious enforcement has been the cause of untold human misery. If there are common threads of truth in religious thought, they are, simultaneously, common threads of truth in human thought. Therefore, the most sensible approach to devising a human society based on peace is surely to examine our human condition using human reason. I actually think that this is probably what the 'prophets' (by and large) have often done - but the 'religiofication' (is that a word?) of their sayings leads us away from peace rather than towards it. Peace is not so much about the universal acceptance of religious ideas, surely it is more about the condition of being able to differ agreeably.