dfnj
Well-Known Member
Joseph Atwell's Caesar's Messiah defiles timelines: Constantine didn't adopt Christianity until the end of his life, and then Rome accepted Christianity after.
Christianity (John, Paul, and Simon) was deliberately made up by the Pharisees to rewrite the Tanakh's prophecy, as the Jews have been divorced (Zechariah 11), so they rewrote the Gospel to suit an agenda.
Only someone who doesn't study the text properly, as they're looking to debunk it, would miss this; which shows the world is full of very argumentative people, who don't think rationally i.e. we're down near Hell before Judgement Day.
In my opinion.
It seems to me you did not watch the video.
"With the analysis done by Joseph Atwill, the key lies in the Dead Sea Scrolls which are the only Jewish literature ever discovered from the first century AD or CE... the time Jesus would have been preaching among the Jews. The characters in the Dead Sea Scrolls were militaristic and you can see that this movement wanted to push the foreigners out of Israel; they were fundamentalists, whereas the characters of the Gospels are not.
Joseph began studying the other two major works of that era, The 'New testament' and the 'Wars of the Jews' by Josephus, a Roman court historian who described the war between the Romans and the Jews in the first century. While reading these works side by side he noticed an amazing connection between them.
Certain events from the ministry of Jesus seem to closely parallel episodes from the military campaign of Titus Flavius. A campaign which took place forty years after Jesus supposedly lived. Joseph's efforts to understand these connections led him to an incredible discovery. Christianity had been invented by a little known family of Roman Caesars, the Flavians, and they left us documents to prove it."
It's very hard to argue with Atwill's argument with regards to the over 40 topological associations all in the SAME sequence and in the same locations between the two literally works compared in his study. The locations and sequence of Jesus travels through the Gospel line up with the military campaign of Titus Flavius as if Titus Flavius is implied to be the Jewish savior! The propaganda was designed to imply Titus Flavius was the son of God! The Romans were using religion to govern the people in an occupied land.
So how can you deny the 40 topological associations all in the same sequence and in the same locations between the two literally works? In my opinion, this is compelling evidence supporting the author's thesis.