ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Yup. i.e. Beliefs.
Common ancestry hasn't even made it to a theory... after 150 years.
They believe it... in faith.
Simply untrue. There is plentiful evidence.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yup. i.e. Beliefs.
Common ancestry hasn't even made it to a theory... after 150 years.
They believe it... in faith.
Are scientists any closer to figuring out, since Darwin's theory was expounded, what is that proposed unknown common ancestor of gorillas, chimpanzees and humans? With all those bones and dna findings, still no certain common ancestor?
Why are you ridiculing your own beliefs?Right. So you're saying the common ancestor is??? Dirt? Clay?
Still fibbing your way through 'faith' protection, I see.Yup. i.e. Beliefs.
Common ancestry hasn't even made it to a theory... after 150 years.
They believe it... in faith.
Not as many that have been on this forum for years, who pretend to have studied the subject, yet still ask the sorts of questions a 5th grader might ask.You will be told to do some googling as this is the university most graduate in a few minutes from. Also you would be questioned on your honesty and agenda. Thats the way many roll.
Nope.God is the father of all. Thus, He is the common ancestor.
Shouldn'tas soon as they find.......the rib
the one that Eve was made from
Not as many that have been on this forum for years, who pretend to have studied the subject, yet still ask the sorts of questions a 5th grader might ask.
So you did not read (or understand) my response. Typical.So you think procreative line to Ms. Aniston is evolution of some common ancestor of bonobos, and chimps. Ok, thanks for clarifying your belief.
It was all your post deserved.Maybe. But still, many do.
Saying things like "others do stupid things more than my tribe" is not really a great response.
Still no answer.
Three years of answering the same 'questions' from you tends to make people see what you're up to.Just putdowns from you and people like you.
Your 5th grade buddy tell you that?Btw, scientists keep changing what they think reality is. Brains smarter, bigger, maybe yes, maybe no.
No, you're not.I'm going by what scientists say.
Non sequitur.Going back to science for a moment, when Leewunhoek discovered microbes, that was a fantastic discovery. It proved that things we wouldn't ordinarily see exist. It doesn't prove evolution.
Are you really bringing up genetics again?For starters, I will say that genetics certainly play a part in differentiation. But...chimpanzees remain chimpanzees and kangaroos, however they came about, are kangaroos.
No. But I am trying to understand why some think or believe the theory of evolution is scientifically, proveably, true.
Yes...too bad we won't find that rib.....Eve was made from
@nPeace, saw your comment and was reminded of your comical antics of yore, and I see that you have not changed.Mention the words Darwin, scientists, theory, etc., and you'll get a large trail of ants coming out the woodwork.
Better get some Diatomaceous Earth.
Idiot - a stupid person ; a person of low intelligence ; stupid - having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.
To further highlight how big a problem this is for them...
Evidence of a chimpanzee-sized ancestor of humans but a gibbon-sized ancestor of apes
Body mass directly affects how an animal relates to its environment and has a wide range of biological implications. However, little is known about the mass of the last common ancestor (LCA) of humans and chimpanzees, hominids (great apes and humans), or hominoids (all apes and humans), which is needed to evaluate numerous paleobiological hypotheses at and prior to the root of our lineage. Here we use phylogenetic comparative methods and data from primates including humans, fossil hominins, and a wide sample of fossil primates including Miocene apes from Africa, Europe, and Asia to test alternative hypotheses of body mass evolution. Our results suggest, contrary to previous suggestions, that the LCA of all hominoids lived in an environment that favored a gibbon-like size, but a series of selective regime shifts, possibly due to resource availability, led to a decrease and then increase in body mass in early hominins from a chimpanzee-sized LCA.
All approaches to understanding the past must work with limited data. Like many other kinds of evidence of past peoples, the relation between ancient DNA and past events is intermediated by complex models that bear many assumptions, some untested or untestable. Statements about the past from this evidence are thus accompanied by uncertainty, some quantified and some unquantifiable. Accurate communication of this uncertainty is essential to effective cross-disciplinary collaboration and public understanding.
That's huge.
Guesswork then, is all they can manage, really... but who knew.
Certainly not idiots.
You just do not like the fact that there is overwhelming evidence so you make up false conclusions about what the studies say.
Clearly a desperate act.
And even worse (for him) - providing more evidence that creationists tend to be ignorant and dishonest.All you are doing is providing more and more supportive information for evolution theory.