Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
There was rumors of collusion with Wario through Luigi. We all know how that game is played.As a voter, I would support it! No one plays a Luigi because he sucks.
Impeach Biden !
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There was rumors of collusion with Wario through Luigi. We all know how that game is played.As a voter, I would support it! No one plays a Luigi because he sucks.
Please enlighten me your ulterior responce to the title of the subject.
Nah, I understand your attempting to cover for this doofus.
The upshot is that you shouldn't criticize Biden for anything.No, I did not defend him the majority of the time because on this forum it would have been a waste of time.
But now the shoe is on the other foot and I will ding this administration ever chance I get; that is until the weather gets better, or when I'm engrossed in my Xbox. Then I have better things to do than antagonize those that think the current herd of Democrats are untouchable.
From the link:Poor Joe seems he isn't being kept informened by his staff.
Or is it he really doesn't know or remember.
Fact Check: Were there no COVID vaccines when Joe Biden became president?
Just like the left!It just amazes me that some people are so biased and so petty that they ignore tens of thousands of Trump lies but jump on any perceived "gaffs" of Biden.
In their minds, Trump could never have done anything wrong. I guess that's what defines a cult following.
from the post-Trump-stress-disorder crowd I would hazard to guess.I would expect nothing less but be prepared for the hypocrisy claims to come fast and heavy.
Well, I think it is fair to question why you chose not to hold previous administrations to the same standard. My guess is it is purely partisan against anything that isn't the GOP.from the post-Trump-stress-disorder crowd I would hazard to guess.
Does anyone call Dem & Pub administrations onWell, I think it is fair to question why you chose not to hold previous administrations to the same standard. My guess is it is purely partisan against anything that isn't the GOP.
Some level of consistency would be a nice bonus. Other times, like this one, it is glaring and pretty obvious. This doesn't discredit the point but it does discredit the person giving it.Does anyone call Dem & Pub administrations on
misdeeds equally? Nah....no one does (IMO).
If one can only criticize X if they equally criticize Y,
then no criticism of either is valid.
People will have biases. This doesn't make their
opinions invalid. And it's not a standard of judgement
that the accuser would want applied to oneself.
Is it ever not glaring...people's tendency toSome level of consistency would be a nice bonus. Other times, like this one, it is glaring and pretty obvious. This doesn't discredit the point but it does discredit the person giving it.
More than > never, which is what is happening here with esmith. It is possible I am missing something, but I cannot think of a single instance, in the entirety of the Trump administration, that Trump was held accountable or questioned by the OP. That is my point.Is it ever not glaring...people's tendency to
criticize one side more than the other?
So Esmith is biased.More than > never, which is what is happening here with esmith. It is possible I am missing something, but I cannot think of a single instance, in the entirety of the Trump administration, that Trump was held accountable or questioned by the OP. That is my point.
It really doesn't matter to me, but there shouldn't be any whining or underhanded comments when others hold your feet to the flames over it.
If you are going to flip flop positions based on political party alone, is the discussion worth having? For me, that answer is clearly no. It happens in a majority of threads here, hence me spending less time here. I am not here to change his or your mind. Simply pointing out the reason his posts are not well received by others.So Esmith is biased.
I am. You are. So is everyone else who would dismiss
our opinions because of bias.
I don't understand this "flip flop" accusation.If you are going to flip flop positions based on political party alone, is the discussion worth having?
His opinions are troubling to some posters on the otherFor me, that answer is clearly no. It happens in a majority of threads here, hence me spending less time here. I am not here to change his or your mind. Simply pointing out the reason his posts are not well received by others.
Sure, the idea that when one party is in power and conducts themselves in a certain way is acceptable because they are the party you support. But then condemning others for acting in a similar fashion. In one instance, it is acceptable or excusable. In others, it isn't. Discussions quickly become circular because it is impossible to identify a spot to draw the line because it is always moving.I don't understand this "flip flop" accusation.
Could you explain?
In some cases, I agree. In others, it helps to have another example of similar conduct to try to find a place where both people agree. This is idealistic, but this discussion wouldn't have to happen if those of the various parties would hold their own accountable. In this specific example, a simple "I agree, Trump said things that I don't agree with either. But, for now, let's focus on Biden." Instead, we get none of that compromise so the position becomes a bit more aggressive. I am not innocent of this charge, it is something I am trying to work on.His opinions are troubling to some posters on the other
side of the aisle. But I observe that this condition happens
in both directions.
It strikes me that too many people try to derail threads by
the opposition. Criticize Biden...they bring up Trump.
Criticize Trump...they bring up Biden. I believe this
phenomenon is called "whataboutism", which is used to
derail discussions.
Yes, I see that too.Sure, the idea that when one party is in power and conducts themselves in a certain way is acceptable because they are the party you support. But then condemning others for acting in a similar fashion. In one instance, it is acceptable or excusable. In others, it isn't. Discussions quickly become circular because it is impossible to identify a spot to draw the line because it is always moving.
OK.In some cases, I agree. In others, it helps to have another example of similar conduct to try to find a place where both people agree. This is idealistic, but this discussion wouldn't have to happen if those of the various parties would hold their own accountable. In this specific example, a simple "I agree, Trump said things that I don't agree with either. But, for now, let's focus on Biden." Instead, we get none of that compromise so the position becomes a bit more aggressive. I am not innocent of this charge, it is something I am trying to work on.
I was writing about your not dinging Trump not the reverse.No, I did not defend him the majority of the time because on this forum it would have been a waste of time.
But now the shoe is on the other foot and I will ding this administration ever chance I get; that is until the weather gets better, or when I'm engrossed in my Xbox. Then I have better things to do than antagonize those that think the current herd of Democrats are untouchable.
I agreed with almost every decision he came to as far as the economy, national defense, and border security was concerned.I was writing about your not dinging Trump not the reverse.
Just like the left!
Cept its a cult of partisanship rather than a personality. Obama was the closest though for a cult based on personality.