PureX
Veteran Member
I didn't.Perhaps you could explain why you set morality aside to support Hillary in 2016?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I didn't.Perhaps you could explain why you set morality aside to support Hillary in 2016?
You misunderstand......you're still sitting there repeating that old ... "Nut-huh! YOU did!" mantra, as if that somehow mitigates the insanity, or worse yet, justifies it.
In an election with only 2 possible winners,I didn't.
It does not pervade both sides equally, which is what you and others are so desperately and repeatedly trying to imply, as a way of somehow mitigating it, or worse yet, justifying it. But especially, to avoid having to take ANY responsibility for it.You misunderstand.
The problem is that the irrationality & meanness pervades both sides.
One should not blame one side & ignore the other (thereby justifying it).
I never said or even implied "equally", so you cannotIt does not pervade both sides equally....
I did not have to set aside morality to support Clinton. I don't vote based on how the candidate will effect me, pragmatically, or personally.In an election with only 2 possible winners,
if you oppose one, this gives power to the other.
Using your language....how do you justify setting
aside morality to give Hillary that support?
Then this would speak to the immorality of your morality.I did not have to set aside morality to support Clinton. I don't vote based on how the candidate will effect me, pragmatically, or personally.
Then why did you even bring it up? The article is not about "both sides". It's about the inexplicable support and defense of ongoing, indefensible behavior by a resident.I never said or even implied "equally", ...
When you don't see the words "equal", "equally", orThen why did you even bring it up?
The traits cited in your article apply to your side too.The article is not about "both sides". It's about the inexplicable support and defense of ongoing, indefensible behavior by a resident.
It’s only inexplicable and indefensible because you suffer from TDS.Then why did you even bring it up? The article is not about "both sides". It's about the inexplicable support and defense of ongoing, indefensible behavior by a resident.
We all owe it to ourselves to try to understand those who disagree.It’s only inexplicable and indefensible because you suffer from TDS.
China is probably one of the best examples of tribalism around today.
It’s only inexplicable and indefensible because you suffer from TDS.
Mirror mirrorI think it's because they have no idea what ELSE to do in the face of such persistent, inexplicable, insanity. I know I certainly don't.
Yea. Wheres the other side?It is a little... one sided, isn't it?
I’m not right, nor LDS.In few words, yes.
Not that your right is not afflicted with LDS
Because they're not "otherwise"?Why, for example, do otherwise intelligent, honest, people set aside their sense of morality when it comes to their own practical gain?
Quite right -- when we can talk to one another, rather than at one another, we have some chance of finding common ground.It might could be viewed that way.
I was also struck by how it applied to so many in both parties.
What's really going on (IMO) is that each side goes to great
lengths to analyze the other so as to view them as corrupt,
dumb, uneducated, bigoted, & just downright evil.
This attitude avoids seeing any merit in the other side.
Or Trump's refusal to shake her hand...Not that Im a Trump supporter, but next we need an explanation for Democrat's childish over reaction to Trump. Like Pelosi's recent meltdown on camera (ripping the speech up)