• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Are "black" Americans owed something besides the protection provided by the same laws ...

Phaedrus

Active Member
When Spanish people receive their reparations post-Trump, I imagine the white-privileged individuals are going to whine.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
Yes:

1. The descendants of slaves are owed reparations and compensation from the estates of the owners of those slaves. Any wealth created through slavery should be treated as the proceeds of crime and returned to its rightful owners, or to those who would have inherited the wealth from its rightful owners.

This isn't a simplistic "white" versus "black" issue, but on the whole, the slaves and their descendants tend to be black, and those who have received wealth obtained from slavery tend to be white.

2. Equal treatment in all respects does nothing to address the impacts today of unfair disadvantage in the past. Refusing to acknowledge these impacts effectively means making these disadvantages permanent. It does not create equal opportunity.

3. If you think that black people and white people enjoy equal protection and rights in the US today, give your head a shake. "Police shooting" is a leading cause of death for young men of one particular racial group. Want to guess which?
Shouldn´t they sue the families of black Africans, and or the Muslims who sold them into slavery in the first place ? White slavers really didn't like going into the interior. They let the above capture folk, and they bought them. Since you have appointed yourself the Canadian dispenser of American taxpayer dollars and guilt, don´t forget the ones who started the ball rolling.

BTW, what reparations have you set up for the families of British owned slaves ? Even American slavery was legal under the British government, it is really the fault of the people of the UK, THEY should be paying for the slavery up to 1776, get on it !
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
Well, I am not an US citizen so I don't really have a view on this specific matter.
But they are a minority who are often victims of ongoing discrimination. So they do have a right to demand corrective actions that redress those discrimination effects.
So called affirmative action has been doing so for decades.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Nope, only for freed slaves. I owe no one else anything related to slavery.
So Bill can keep the car.

I have ancestors who died fighting on the union side in the Civil war. Perhaps Blacks owe me something for that loss.
I'd say that the traitors your ancestors were fighting are the ones that owe you. I'd have no issue with you pursuing a claim from the estate of the people who killed your ancestors.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
So called affirmative action has been doing so for decades.
As long as discrimination exists, corrective actions that seek to negate those effects should too.
This is like saying antibiotics are being prescribed for decades and we now need to stop taking medicines even though illness causing bacteria are still making folks sick!
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Shouldn´t they sue the families of black Africans, and or the Muslims who sold them into slavery in the first place ?
Sure, but it's not an either/or thing.

White slavers really didn't like going into the interior. They let the above capture folk, and they bought them. Since you have appointed yourself the Canadian dispenser of American taxpayer dollars and guilt, don´t forget the ones who started the ball rolling.
If having a foreigner point out your country's injustices is uncomfortable for you, then maybe do something to correct those injustices.

BTW, what reparations have you set up for the families of British owned slaves ? Even American slavery was legal under the British government, it is really the fault of the people of the UK, THEY should be paying for the slavery up to 1776, get on it !
I don't disagree.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Sure, but it's not an either/or thing.


If having a foreigner point out your country's injustices is uncomfortable for you, then maybe do something to correct those injustices.


I don't disagree.

Canada too had slavery.
And you live on stolen land.

If having a foreigner point that out to you
is uncomfortable, there are remedies.

Ignore

or

Set things straight at home, then move on
to dispense lessons in justice and morality abroad.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Anyone calling for reparations who is not
ready to give the land back to the Indians
is just playing virtue-signaling.

I'm a little bit Native American, so does that mean I get a little bit of land back? o_O
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Well, I am not an US citizen so I don't really have a view on this specific matter.
But they are a minority who are often victims of ongoing discrimination. So they do have a right to demand corrective actions that redress those discrimination effects.

Eliminate all legal discrimination*, and make disgraceful
any ongoing discrimination-that is the action needed,
and being taken.

After that, it is up to the individual to make him / herself
into someone. An uneducated criminal bum is going
to get "discriminated" against.

Some previously victimized minority groups have
pushed themselves to the heights, others have
stayed mired in their past.

Ideas on how to redress / change that are in demand.

*based on racial /ethnic, religious etc reasons
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Anyone calling for reparations who is not
ready to give the land back to the Indians
is just playing virtue-signaling.
Well, not all of it.
EuroColonialists did pay $24 and some beads for Manhattan.

But there are still contracts signed by the official representatives of the USA government that would be hugely inconvenient to a lot of USonians if they were enforced.
We're not talking about some ancient history from the middle east or Africa or whatever. The government of the USA signed contracts with the indigenous people and then broke them with impunity.
Those contracts still exist.
Tom
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Well, not all of it.
EuroColonialists did pay $24 and some beads for Manhattan.

But there are still contracts signed by the official representatives of the USA government that would be hugely inconvenient to a lot of USonians if they were enforced.
We're not talking about some ancient history from the middle east or Africa or whatever. The government of the USA signed contracts with the indigenous people and then broke them with impunity.
Those contracts still exist.
Tom

Not even Manhattan, it too is stolen.

The Manhattan contract such as it was, was for
temporary use of limited hunting / fishing / farming
privileges.

It was a great place, when the estuary was
full of oysters, rich with salmon, sturgeon,
shad. Nobody would abandon it for some
trinkets.
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
Are "black" Americans owed something by "white" Americans or the government other than the protection provided by the same laws that provide protection for the rest of American citizens?
I think by 2019 we should have no race-recognizing advantages. By now we are each Americans with a complicated individual family history that is beyond sorting out today.

I favor anti-discrimination laws but oppose things like affirmative action, reparations and even special status and rights/advantages for Indian tribes. Anything but a 'one America' society is not the way towards the future.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
I think by 2019 we should have no race-recognizing advantages. By now we are each Americans with a complicated individual family history that is beyond sorting out today.

I favor anti-discrimination laws but oppose things like affirmative action, reparations and even special status and rights/advantages for Indian tribes. Anything but a 'one America' society is not the way towards the future.


Key word, "should". You could have stopped there.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
So, because Blacks are killed by police shootings, the police are hunting blacks to kill them ?
More likely that in split-second, life-and-death situations, a cop's implicit biases can make the difference between life and death for the person in front of them.

You are so ignorant on this issue, if you weren´t a Canadian, I would be surprised.
If it helps, I'm much less ignorant than the fictional version of me you've created.

Very rarely, a police officer does commit a shooting out of policy, or with criminal intent. Those should be prosecuted fully.

The vast majority of police shootings are justified.
And there are situations where the officer would be justified in either firing or not firing. From the stats, it seems that in these borderline cases, American cops decide to shoot more often for black suspects than they do for white ones.

Because it is a white Officer and Black suspect, or even a Black Officer, ignoring the facts to whip up hysteria doesn´t change the facts.
I'd be interested to know what facts you think I'm ignoring.

You know nothing of the dynamics involved, I have experienced them.
If you say so. I know you say you were a cop; I don't have reason to say that you're lying, but I also don't exactly trust you to be honest.

Your opinion is totally irrelevant when it comes to reality, related to this issue.
Apparently, you think that it's relevant enough to engage with it.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I think by 2019 we should have no race-recognizing advantages. By now we are each Americans with a complicated individual family history that is beyond sorting out today.

I favor anti-discrimination laws but oppose things like affirmative action, reparations and even special status and rights/advantages for Indian tribes. Anything but a 'one America' society is not the way towards the future.
So for any existing disadvantages, just lock those in and refuse to deal with them?
 
Top