Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Shouldn´t they sue the families of black Africans, and or the Muslims who sold them into slavery in the first place ? White slavers really didn't like going into the interior. They let the above capture folk, and they bought them. Since you have appointed yourself the Canadian dispenser of American taxpayer dollars and guilt, don´t forget the ones who started the ball rolling.Yes:
1. The descendants of slaves are owed reparations and compensation from the estates of the owners of those slaves. Any wealth created through slavery should be treated as the proceeds of crime and returned to its rightful owners, or to those who would have inherited the wealth from its rightful owners.
This isn't a simplistic "white" versus "black" issue, but on the whole, the slaves and their descendants tend to be black, and those who have received wealth obtained from slavery tend to be white.
2. Equal treatment in all respects does nothing to address the impacts today of unfair disadvantage in the past. Refusing to acknowledge these impacts effectively means making these disadvantages permanent. It does not create equal opportunity.
3. If you think that black people and white people enjoy equal protection and rights in the US today, give your head a shake. "Police shooting" is a leading cause of death for young men of one particular racial group. Want to guess which?
So called affirmative action has been doing so for decades.Well, I am not an US citizen so I don't really have a view on this specific matter.
But they are a minority who are often victims of ongoing discrimination. So they do have a right to demand corrective actions that redress those discrimination effects.
So Bill can keep the car.Nope, only for freed slaves. I owe no one else anything related to slavery.
I'd say that the traitors your ancestors were fighting are the ones that owe you. I'd have no issue with you pursuing a claim from the estate of the people who killed your ancestors.I have ancestors who died fighting on the union side in the Civil war. Perhaps Blacks owe me something for that loss.
As long as discrimination exists, corrective actions that seek to negate those effects should too.So called affirmative action has been doing so for decades.
Sure, but it's not an either/or thing.Shouldn´t they sue the families of black Africans, and or the Muslims who sold them into slavery in the first place ?
If having a foreigner point out your country's injustices is uncomfortable for you, then maybe do something to correct those injustices.White slavers really didn't like going into the interior. They let the above capture folk, and they bought them. Since you have appointed yourself the Canadian dispenser of American taxpayer dollars and guilt, don´t forget the ones who started the ball rolling.
I don't disagree.BTW, what reparations have you set up for the families of British owned slaves ? Even American slavery was legal under the British government, it is really the fault of the people of the UK, THEY should be paying for the slavery up to 1776, get on it !
Are "black" Americans owed something by "white" Americans or the government other than the protection provided by the same laws that provide protection for the rest of American citizens?
I can't help but notice that everybody's dodging this question.You live on stolen land. How do you feel about that.
Sure, but it's not an either/or thing.
If having a foreigner point out your country's injustices is uncomfortable for you, then maybe do something to correct those injustices.
I don't disagree.
I can't help but notice that everybody's dodging this question.
Tom
The best way to get compensation is to work more.
Anyone calling for reparations who is not
ready to give the land back to the Indians
is just playing virtue-signaling.
Well, I am not an US citizen so I don't really have a view on this specific matter.
But they are a minority who are often victims of ongoing discrimination. So they do have a right to demand corrective actions that redress those discrimination effects.
I'm a little bit Native American, so does that mean I get a little bit of land back?
Well, not all of it.Anyone calling for reparations who is not
ready to give the land back to the Indians
is just playing virtue-signaling.
Well, not all of it.
EuroColonialists did pay $24 and some beads for Manhattan.
But there are still contracts signed by the official representatives of the USA government that would be hugely inconvenient to a lot of USonians if they were enforced.
We're not talking about some ancient history from the middle east or Africa or whatever. The government of the USA signed contracts with the indigenous people and then broke them with impunity.
Those contracts still exist.
Tom
I think by 2019 we should have no race-recognizing advantages. By now we are each Americans with a complicated individual family history that is beyond sorting out today.Are "black" Americans owed something by "white" Americans or the government other than the protection provided by the same laws that provide protection for the rest of American citizens?
I think by 2019 we should have no race-recognizing advantages. By now we are each Americans with a complicated individual family history that is beyond sorting out today.
I favor anti-discrimination laws but oppose things like affirmative action, reparations and even special status and rights/advantages for Indian tribes. Anything but a 'one America' society is not the way towards the future.
More likely that in split-second, life-and-death situations, a cop's implicit biases can make the difference between life and death for the person in front of them.So, because Blacks are killed by police shootings, the police are hunting blacks to kill them ?
If it helps, I'm much less ignorant than the fictional version of me you've created.You are so ignorant on this issue, if you weren´t a Canadian, I would be surprised.
And there are situations where the officer would be justified in either firing or not firing. From the stats, it seems that in these borderline cases, American cops decide to shoot more often for black suspects than they do for white ones.Very rarely, a police officer does commit a shooting out of policy, or with criminal intent. Those should be prosecuted fully.
The vast majority of police shootings are justified.
I'd be interested to know what facts you think I'm ignoring.Because it is a white Officer and Black suspect, or even a Black Officer, ignoring the facts to whip up hysteria doesn´t change the facts.
If you say so. I know you say you were a cop; I don't have reason to say that you're lying, but I also don't exactly trust you to be honest.You know nothing of the dynamics involved, I have experienced them.
Apparently, you think that it's relevant enough to engage with it.Your opinion is totally irrelevant when it comes to reality, related to this issue.
So for any existing disadvantages, just lock those in and refuse to deal with them?I think by 2019 we should have no race-recognizing advantages. By now we are each Americans with a complicated individual family history that is beyond sorting out today.
I favor anti-discrimination laws but oppose things like affirmative action, reparations and even special status and rights/advantages for Indian tribes. Anything but a 'one America' society is not the way towards the future.