We Never Know
No Slack
They were treated with hormone therapy.
I can get fake boobs but it doesn't make me female.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You are once again totally out of your depth. And as always misusing the facepalm smiley.
Try milking a bull that thinks its a cow.
Try getting eggs from a rooster that thinks its a hen.
You will end up within no milk and no eggs.
Correct for once. But stopped clocks and all of that. Being transgender is not just about hormone therapy.They were treated with hormone therapy.
I can get fake boobs but it doesn't make me female.
And red haired-ness is statistically less likely to happen than some intersex conditions. Technically speaking
(As is my understanding)
You going to treat red heads as freaks now?
How about left handed folks?
People born with deformities?
How about people born with mental or physical disabilities?
Such things are technically rare as well. Should we not treat such individuals with respect?
Why should the rarity matter even?
Correct for once. But stopped clocks and all of that. Being transgender is not just about hormone therapy.
I was making a point of rarity. That something that innocuous is also technically speaking much rarer than some intersex conditions in our species. (And they were kind of treated like crap in history. Just saying Redheads have been Feared and Vilified Throughout History - Here's Why)How is red haired-ness. color of hair equal to sex identity?
So, you haven't read Frankenstein either.Hormone therapy. In other words science tried to make a male a female. Its like Frankenstein.
The same hormones a ciswomans body produces to lactate.They were treated with hormone therapy.
I can get fake boobs but it doesn't make me female.
So? How is that at all a relevant point?So..... That may, may happen in approximately 1 in 80,000 people
I get it. You are a male living as a female. You will defend it til death. Don't expect me to.So, you haven't read Frankenstein either.
The same hormones a ciswomans body produces to lactate.
Your point was wrong.
You, in this thread, you who said "the doctor can't have sex with a 16 year old but it's ok to operate on a 16 year old," claim someone else is looking foolish?You are doing nothing here but looking foolish. Go argue about a god somewhere.
I am almost tempted to make fun of that. Why? It doesn't make much sense and because apparently you think I need your approval.I get it. You are a male living as a female. You will defend it til death. Don't expect me to.
You, in this thread, you who said "the doctor can't have sex with a 16 year old but it's ok to operate on a 16 year old," claim someone else is looking foolish?
I am almost tempted to make fun of that. Why? Because apparently you think I need your approval.
So? How is that at all a relevant point?
So?Its 0.001% of the world population.
Not an accurate number, I don’t thinkIts 0.001% of the world population.
Category error. One is a (Puritanical) sexual moral made into law, the other is a health question. A medical professional (or, better, more) should determine what would be a good age for the surgery and then decide together with the patient. No government involvement required.Sure. Under 18 can't decide to have sex with someone older without it being a crime but under 18 can decidee to change their sex??